Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: Integrating science and systemic capacity development

This paper argues that the CGIAR -through its CGIAR Research Programmes-is struggling to fulfil its international mandate of conducting strategic research that contributes to agricultural development and global food security. Ongoing reforms have resulted in a situation where the CGIAR is assessed a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leeuwis, Cees, Klerkx, Laurens, Schut, Marc
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/88119
_version_ 1855522276187832320
author Leeuwis, Cees
Klerkx, Laurens
Schut, Marc
author_browse Klerkx, Laurens
Leeuwis, Cees
Schut, Marc
author_facet Leeuwis, Cees
Klerkx, Laurens
Schut, Marc
author_sort Leeuwis, Cees
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This paper argues that the CGIAR -through its CGIAR Research Programmes-is struggling to fulfil its international mandate of conducting strategic research that contributes to agricultural development and global food security. Ongoing reforms have resulted in a situation where the CGIAR is assessed as if it were a development organisation. This leads the CGIAR to raise unrealistic expectations regarding the development impacts of the science conducted, resulting in ever growing distrust between the Centres and the donor community. Moreover, its short-term funding cycle and current mode of safeguarding scientific quality are not conducive to doing strategic and potentially transformative research. The paper proposes changes in the CGIAR impact culture, driven by a shift in policies that govern the everyday implementation and assessment of research. In line with this, we suggest that the best way to combine the international ‘science’ and ‘development’ mandates is through scientific capacity development of staff belonging to national research and innovation systems. This simultaneously requires major changes in the time-horizon of donor funding, and in how research programmes are selected and led. One sentence abstract: The CGIAR should not be managed and assessed as a development organisation, and requires a longer-term horizon in its funding and governance arrangements.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace88119
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace881192024-05-01T08:16:40Z Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: Integrating science and systemic capacity development Leeuwis, Cees Klerkx, Laurens Schut, Marc impact assessment cgiar reform research policy funding policy cgiar research programmes This paper argues that the CGIAR -through its CGIAR Research Programmes-is struggling to fulfil its international mandate of conducting strategic research that contributes to agricultural development and global food security. Ongoing reforms have resulted in a situation where the CGIAR is assessed as if it were a development organisation. This leads the CGIAR to raise unrealistic expectations regarding the development impacts of the science conducted, resulting in ever growing distrust between the Centres and the donor community. Moreover, its short-term funding cycle and current mode of safeguarding scientific quality are not conducive to doing strategic and potentially transformative research. The paper proposes changes in the CGIAR impact culture, driven by a shift in policies that govern the everyday implementation and assessment of research. In line with this, we suggest that the best way to combine the international ‘science’ and ‘development’ mandates is through scientific capacity development of staff belonging to national research and innovation systems. This simultaneously requires major changes in the time-horizon of donor funding, and in how research programmes are selected and led. One sentence abstract: The CGIAR should not be managed and assessed as a development organisation, and requires a longer-term horizon in its funding and governance arrangements. 2018-03 2017-10-03T14:14:18Z 2017-10-03T14:14:18Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/88119 en Limited Access Elsevier Leeuwis, C., Klerkx, L. & Schut, M. (2017). Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: integrating science and systemic capacity development. Global Food Security, 1-5.
spellingShingle impact assessment
cgiar reform
research policy
funding policy
cgiar research programmes
Leeuwis, Cees
Klerkx, Laurens
Schut, Marc
Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: Integrating science and systemic capacity development
title Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: Integrating science and systemic capacity development
title_full Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: Integrating science and systemic capacity development
title_fullStr Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: Integrating science and systemic capacity development
title_full_unstemmed Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: Integrating science and systemic capacity development
title_short Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: Integrating science and systemic capacity development
title_sort reforming the research policy and impact culture in the cgiar integrating science and systemic capacity development
topic impact assessment
cgiar reform
research policy
funding policy
cgiar research programmes
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/88119
work_keys_str_mv AT leeuwiscees reformingtheresearchpolicyandimpactcultureinthecgiarintegratingscienceandsystemiccapacitydevelopment
AT klerkxlaurens reformingtheresearchpolicyandimpactcultureinthecgiarintegratingscienceandsystemiccapacitydevelopment
AT schutmarc reformingtheresearchpolicyandimpactcultureinthecgiarintegratingscienceandsystemiccapacitydevelopment