Heterogeneity in farmers production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: results and implications from northern Nigeria

Sustainable use (in terms of nutrients) of soil resources by farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa is constrained by institutions and markets. This paper explores the case of northern Nigeria, by using a combination of multi-attribute utility theory and bio-economic modelling. This approach allowed us to id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berkhout, Ezra D., Schipper, R.A., Keulen, H. van, Coulibaly, O.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/83297
_version_ 1855542647552212992
author Berkhout, Ezra D.
Schipper, R.A.
Keulen, H. van
Coulibaly, O.
author_browse Berkhout, Ezra D.
Coulibaly, O.
Keulen, H. van
Schipper, R.A.
author_facet Berkhout, Ezra D.
Schipper, R.A.
Keulen, H. van
Coulibaly, O.
author_sort Berkhout, Ezra D.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Sustainable use (in terms of nutrients) of soil resources by farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa is constrained by institutions and markets. This paper explores the case of northern Nigeria, by using a combination of multi-attribute utility theory and bio-economic modelling. This approach allowed us to identify heterogeneity in production strategies and to quantify its effect on the use of soil nutrient resources. We find that farmers with larger land holdings place more emphasis on gross margins in their utility function, while those with larger holdings of fertile fadama fields place more emphasis on sustainability. Risk aversion, operationalised through variance minimization, appears an important attribute in the utility function of many farm households that are more dependent on agriculture for their overall income. A regression analysis shows that differences in production strategies significantly affect nutrient balances, but also shows that such effects are heterogeneous across locations. We find more favourable nutrient balances for some of the more market-oriented farm households who place more emphasis on sustainability. In farm plans of the most risk-averse households, the production of cereals for subsistence consumption dominates and leads to negative soil nutrient balances, especially for potassium. Farmers who place a large importance on gross margins are likely to benefit most from policies aimed at enhancing profitability through improving functioning of markets. The large group of risk-averse farmers will have the largest immediate gain in utility from policies and technologies aimed at reducing production risk in high-value crops. Additional policies aimed at creating a stronger market-oriented production by the least-endowed farm households could play a role in reducing intensity of soil fertility mining. Under these conditions, the efficient cropping pattern shifts partially from cereal cropping to high-value crops, associated with higher input use. The main results are similar to those in other studies, although some of the nutrient balances are less negative. The results do appear to be sensitive to the type of cropping activities included in the analysis, and additional methodological research is required. Extensions of the used method should further account for temporal and spatial differences in soil fertility, leading to differences in nutrient uptake and production, as well as potential temporal heterogeneity in production strategies.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace83297
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2011
publishDateRange 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace832972024-01-17T12:58:34Z Heterogeneity in farmers production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: results and implications from northern Nigeria Berkhout, Ezra D. Schipper, R.A. Keulen, H. van Coulibaly, O. bioeconomics soil fertility mining multi-criteria analysis sustainability heterogeneity Sustainable use (in terms of nutrients) of soil resources by farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa is constrained by institutions and markets. This paper explores the case of northern Nigeria, by using a combination of multi-attribute utility theory and bio-economic modelling. This approach allowed us to identify heterogeneity in production strategies and to quantify its effect on the use of soil nutrient resources. We find that farmers with larger land holdings place more emphasis on gross margins in their utility function, while those with larger holdings of fertile fadama fields place more emphasis on sustainability. Risk aversion, operationalised through variance minimization, appears an important attribute in the utility function of many farm households that are more dependent on agriculture for their overall income. A regression analysis shows that differences in production strategies significantly affect nutrient balances, but also shows that such effects are heterogeneous across locations. We find more favourable nutrient balances for some of the more market-oriented farm households who place more emphasis on sustainability. In farm plans of the most risk-averse households, the production of cereals for subsistence consumption dominates and leads to negative soil nutrient balances, especially for potassium. Farmers who place a large importance on gross margins are likely to benefit most from policies aimed at enhancing profitability through improving functioning of markets. The large group of risk-averse farmers will have the largest immediate gain in utility from policies and technologies aimed at reducing production risk in high-value crops. Additional policies aimed at creating a stronger market-oriented production by the least-endowed farm households could play a role in reducing intensity of soil fertility mining. Under these conditions, the efficient cropping pattern shifts partially from cereal cropping to high-value crops, associated with higher input use. The main results are similar to those in other studies, although some of the nutrient balances are less negative. The results do appear to be sensitive to the type of cropping activities included in the analysis, and additional methodological research is required. Extensions of the used method should further account for temporal and spatial differences in soil fertility, leading to differences in nutrient uptake and production, as well as potential temporal heterogeneity in production strategies. 2011-01 2017-08-30T15:13:00Z 2017-08-30T15:13:00Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/83297 en Limited Access Elsevier Berkhout, E.D., Schipper, R.A., Van Keulen, H. & Coulibaly, O. (2011). Heterogeneity in farmers’ production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: results and implications from northern Nigeria. Agricultural Systems, 104(1), 63-74.
spellingShingle bioeconomics
soil fertility
mining
multi-criteria analysis
sustainability
heterogeneity
Berkhout, Ezra D.
Schipper, R.A.
Keulen, H. van
Coulibaly, O.
Heterogeneity in farmers production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: results and implications from northern Nigeria
title Heterogeneity in farmers production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: results and implications from northern Nigeria
title_full Heterogeneity in farmers production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: results and implications from northern Nigeria
title_fullStr Heterogeneity in farmers production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: results and implications from northern Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity in farmers production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: results and implications from northern Nigeria
title_short Heterogeneity in farmers production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: results and implications from northern Nigeria
title_sort heterogeneity in farmers production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use results and implications from northern nigeria
topic bioeconomics
soil fertility
mining
multi-criteria analysis
sustainability
heterogeneity
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/83297
work_keys_str_mv AT berkhoutezrad heterogeneityinfarmersproductiondecisionsanditsimpactonsoilnutrientuseresultsandimplicationsfromnorthernnigeria
AT schipperra heterogeneityinfarmersproductiondecisionsanditsimpactonsoilnutrientuseresultsandimplicationsfromnorthernnigeria
AT keulenhvan heterogeneityinfarmersproductiondecisionsanditsimpactonsoilnutrientuseresultsandimplicationsfromnorthernnigeria
AT coulibalyo heterogeneityinfarmersproductiondecisionsanditsimpactonsoilnutrientuseresultsandimplicationsfromnorthernnigeria