A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change in developing country agriculture
In the mid‐2000s, several highly‐cited papers called for improving conceptual coherence and methodological transparency in vulnerability research to support greater policy relevance. As reducing vulnerability rises on political agendas, identifying empirically validated measures will become increasi...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82767 |
Ejemplares similares: A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change in developing country agriculture
- A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change: in search of transparency, coherence and comparability
- Systematic Review of Methods in Low-Consensus Fields: Supporting Commensuration through `Construct-Centered Methods Aggregation’ in the Case of Climate Change Vulnerability Research
- Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
- Strengthening the food systems governance evidence base: Supporting commensurability of research through a systematic review of methods
- Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review
- Vulnerability of Food Security to Global Change