Evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems

Three steps in forage germplasm evaluation, leading to the identification of superior cultivars, are discussed. Emphasis is given to the use of the grazing animal to defoliate the collection of accessions, beginning in the introduction nursery to provide preliminary information on acceptability and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mott, G.O.
Format: Book Chapter
Language:Inglés
Published: International Center for Tropical Agriculture 1993
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82072
_version_ 1855516675472883712
author Mott, G.O.
author_browse Mott, G.O.
author_facet Mott, G.O.
author_sort Mott, G.O.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Three steps in forage germplasm evaluation, leading to the identification of superior cultivars, are discussed. Emphasis is given to the use of the grazing animal to defoliate the collection of accessions, beginning in the introduction nursery to provide preliminary information on acceptability and persistence of genotypes. As the evaluation continues, the number and complexity of experimental variables increase to include components of grazing management. A range of factors encompasses both the spectrum of environmental circumstances and the defoliation management systems likely to be encountered under farm conditions. Response surface methodology provides designs for estimating optimal operating conditions when multiple factors are studied in combination. Central composite designs and their modifications are suggested as alternatives for providing information around the optima when several experimental and response variables are of interest. Some examples of response surface designs are given for forage germplasm evaluation. In evaluating forage germplasm, past emphasis was primarily to select for the highest yielding lines. However, these selections are not necessarily the most persistent under grazing. The farmer is interested in persistence which suggests that the plant breeder and agronomist should reevaluate the methods used to screen superior lines. This paper illustrates experimental designs which will provide information on the interactions between forage plants and the grazing animal. The interface between the animal and the plant, especially the effect that the stress imposed by the grazing animal has on plant survival and production, is also discussed.
format Book Chapter
id CGSpace82072
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1993
publishDateRange 1993
publishDateSort 1993
publisher International Center for Tropical Agriculture
publisherStr International Center for Tropical Agriculture
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace820722025-11-05T16:54:46Z Evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems Mott, G.O. feed crops germplasm evaluation varieties grazing systems plantas forrajeras germoplasma evaluación variedades sistemas de pastoreo Three steps in forage germplasm evaluation, leading to the identification of superior cultivars, are discussed. Emphasis is given to the use of the grazing animal to defoliate the collection of accessions, beginning in the introduction nursery to provide preliminary information on acceptability and persistence of genotypes. As the evaluation continues, the number and complexity of experimental variables increase to include components of grazing management. A range of factors encompasses both the spectrum of environmental circumstances and the defoliation management systems likely to be encountered under farm conditions. Response surface methodology provides designs for estimating optimal operating conditions when multiple factors are studied in combination. Central composite designs and their modifications are suggested as alternatives for providing information around the optima when several experimental and response variables are of interest. Some examples of response surface designs are given for forage germplasm evaluation. In evaluating forage germplasm, past emphasis was primarily to select for the highest yielding lines. However, these selections are not necessarily the most persistent under grazing. The farmer is interested in persistence which suggests that the plant breeder and agronomist should reevaluate the methods used to screen superior lines. This paper illustrates experimental designs which will provide information on the interactions between forage plants and the grazing animal. The interface between the animal and the plant, especially the effect that the stress imposed by the grazing animal has on plant survival and production, is also discussed. 1993 2017-06-20T09:00:49Z 2017-06-20T09:00:49Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82072 en Open Access application/pdf International Center for Tropical Agriculture Mott, G.O.. 1993. Evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems . In: Paladines M., Osvaldo L.; Lascano, Carlos E. (eds.). Forage germplasm under small-plot grazing: Evaluation of methodologies: Proceedings of a workshop held in Cali, Colombia, 22-24 September 1982 . Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, CO. p. 193-211. (CIAT publication no. 210)
spellingShingle feed crops
germplasm
evaluation
varieties
grazing systems
plantas forrajeras
germoplasma
evaluación
variedades
sistemas de pastoreo
Mott, G.O.
Evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems
title Evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems
title_full Evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems
title_fullStr Evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems
title_short Evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems
title_sort evaluation pasture germplasm under different grazing management systems
topic feed crops
germplasm
evaluation
varieties
grazing systems
plantas forrajeras
germoplasma
evaluación
variedades
sistemas de pastoreo
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/82072
work_keys_str_mv AT mottgo evaluationpasturegermplasmunderdifferentgrazingmanagementsystems