Evaluation of bias correction method for satellite-based rainfall data

With the advances in remote sensing technology, satellite-based rainfall estimates are gaining attraction in the eld of hydrology, particularly in rainfall-runoff modeling. Since estimates are affected by errors correction is required. In this study, we tested the high resolution National Oceanic an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatti, H.A., Rientjes, T.H.M., Haile, Alemseged Tamiru, Habib, E., Verhoef, W.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/81164
_version_ 1855524994213216256
author Bhatti, H.A.
Rientjes, T.H.M.
Haile, Alemseged Tamiru
Habib, E.
Verhoef, W.
author_browse Bhatti, H.A.
Habib, E.
Haile, Alemseged Tamiru
Rientjes, T.H.M.
Verhoef, W.
author_facet Bhatti, H.A.
Rientjes, T.H.M.
Haile, Alemseged Tamiru
Habib, E.
Verhoef, W.
author_sort Bhatti, H.A.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description With the advances in remote sensing technology, satellite-based rainfall estimates are gaining attraction in the eld of hydrology, particularly in rainfall-runoff modeling. Since estimates are affected by errors correction is required. In this study, we tested the high resolution National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate Prediction Centre (CPC) morphing technique (CMORPH) satellite rainfall product (CMORPH) in the Gilgel Abbey catchment, Ethiopia. CMORPH data at 8 km-30 min resolution is aggregated to daily to match in-situ observations for the period 2003–2010. Study objectives are to assess bias of the satellite estimates, to identify optimum window size for application of bias correction and to test effectiveness of bias correction. Bias correction factors are calculated for moving window (MW) sizes and for sequential windows (SW’s) of 3, 5, 7, 9, ... , 31 days with the aim to assess error distribution between the in-situ observations and CMORPH estimates. We tested forward, central and backward window (FW, CW and BW) schemes to assess the effect of time integration on accumulated rainfall. Accuracy of cumulative rainfall depth is assessed by Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). To systematically correct all CMORPH estimates, station based bias factors are spatially interpolated to yield a bias factor map. Reliability of interpolation is assessed by cross validation. The uncorrected CMORPH rainfall images are multiplied by the interpolated bias map to result in bias corrected CMORPH estimates. Findings are evaluated by RMSE, correlation coef cient (r) and standard deviation (SD). Results showed existence of bias in the CMORPH rainfall. It is found that the 7 days SW approach performs best for bias correction of CMORPH rainfall. The outcome of this study showed the ef ciency of our bias correction approach.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace81164
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher MDPI
publisherStr MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace811642025-03-11T09:50:20Z Evaluation of bias correction method for satellite-based rainfall data Bhatti, H.A. Rientjes, T.H.M. Haile, Alemseged Tamiru Habib, E. Verhoef, W. satellite observation rain remote sensing catchment areas runoff water hydrology precipitation meteorology spatial distribution With the advances in remote sensing technology, satellite-based rainfall estimates are gaining attraction in the eld of hydrology, particularly in rainfall-runoff modeling. Since estimates are affected by errors correction is required. In this study, we tested the high resolution National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate Prediction Centre (CPC) morphing technique (CMORPH) satellite rainfall product (CMORPH) in the Gilgel Abbey catchment, Ethiopia. CMORPH data at 8 km-30 min resolution is aggregated to daily to match in-situ observations for the period 2003–2010. Study objectives are to assess bias of the satellite estimates, to identify optimum window size for application of bias correction and to test effectiveness of bias correction. Bias correction factors are calculated for moving window (MW) sizes and for sequential windows (SW’s) of 3, 5, 7, 9, ... , 31 days with the aim to assess error distribution between the in-situ observations and CMORPH estimates. We tested forward, central and backward window (FW, CW and BW) schemes to assess the effect of time integration on accumulated rainfall. Accuracy of cumulative rainfall depth is assessed by Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). To systematically correct all CMORPH estimates, station based bias factors are spatially interpolated to yield a bias factor map. Reliability of interpolation is assessed by cross validation. The uncorrected CMORPH rainfall images are multiplied by the interpolated bias map to result in bias corrected CMORPH estimates. Findings are evaluated by RMSE, correlation coef cient (r) and standard deviation (SD). Results showed existence of bias in the CMORPH rainfall. It is found that the 7 days SW approach performs best for bias correction of CMORPH rainfall. The outcome of this study showed the ef ciency of our bias correction approach. 2016 2017-05-23T04:32:19Z 2017-05-23T04:32:19Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/81164 en Open Access MDPI Bhatti, H. A.; Rientjes, T.; Haile, Alemseged Tamiru; Habib, E.; Verhoef, W. 2016. Evaluation of bias correction method for satellite-based rainfall data. Sensors, 16(6):1-16. doi: 10.3390/s16060884
spellingShingle satellite observation
rain
remote sensing
catchment areas
runoff water
hydrology
precipitation
meteorology
spatial distribution
Bhatti, H.A.
Rientjes, T.H.M.
Haile, Alemseged Tamiru
Habib, E.
Verhoef, W.
Evaluation of bias correction method for satellite-based rainfall data
title Evaluation of bias correction method for satellite-based rainfall data
title_full Evaluation of bias correction method for satellite-based rainfall data
title_fullStr Evaluation of bias correction method for satellite-based rainfall data
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of bias correction method for satellite-based rainfall data
title_short Evaluation of bias correction method for satellite-based rainfall data
title_sort evaluation of bias correction method for satellite based rainfall data
topic satellite observation
rain
remote sensing
catchment areas
runoff water
hydrology
precipitation
meteorology
spatial distribution
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/81164
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattiha evaluationofbiascorrectionmethodforsatellitebasedrainfalldata
AT rientjesthm evaluationofbiascorrectionmethodforsatellitebasedrainfalldata
AT hailealemsegedtamiru evaluationofbiascorrectionmethodforsatellitebasedrainfalldata
AT habibe evaluationofbiascorrectionmethodforsatellitebasedrainfalldata
AT verhoefw evaluationofbiascorrectionmethodforsatellitebasedrainfalldata