Scenario guided policy planning: processes, comparisons, and lessons from East Africa
Key messages: Participants in policy processes require constant communication and networking among stakeholders to be able to exploit the available policy windows. The review process requires a dynamic and engaging tool. The robustness of a review tool is one step toward having a good and fruitful r...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Brief |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79793 |
| _version_ | 1855514927997911040 |
|---|---|
| author | Muchunguzi, Perez Ampaire, Edidah L. Acosta, Mariola Rutting, Lucas Tumuhereze, Martin Mwongera, Caroline Okiror, John Francis Asten, Piet J.A. van |
| author_browse | Acosta, Mariola Ampaire, Edidah L. Asten, Piet J.A. van Muchunguzi, Perez Mwongera, Caroline Okiror, John Francis Rutting, Lucas Tumuhereze, Martin |
| author_facet | Muchunguzi, Perez Ampaire, Edidah L. Acosta, Mariola Rutting, Lucas Tumuhereze, Martin Mwongera, Caroline Okiror, John Francis Asten, Piet J.A. van |
| author_sort | Muchunguzi, Perez |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Key messages: Participants in policy processes require constant communication and networking among stakeholders to be able to exploit the available policy windows. The review process requires a dynamic and engaging tool. The robustness of a review tool is one step toward having a good and fruitful review process. Using socio-economic scenarios and quantitative evidence in policy review processes allows policy actors to develop a great body of information in an all-inclusive manner, keeping all stakeholders engaged. This alone, however, does not guarantee success. State and non-state actors need to invest in trust building if the citizenry is to benefit from the fast approaching private-public partnership frameworks. It is beneficial to work on a single policy document that is already under a review or formulation process. |
| format | Brief |
| id | CGSpace79793 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateRange | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace797932024-01-23T12:03:19Z Scenario guided policy planning: processes, comparisons, and lessons from East Africa Muchunguzi, Perez Ampaire, Edidah L. Acosta, Mariola Rutting, Lucas Tumuhereze, Martin Mwongera, Caroline Okiror, John Francis Asten, Piet J.A. van climate change agriculture food security policies Key messages: Participants in policy processes require constant communication and networking among stakeholders to be able to exploit the available policy windows. The review process requires a dynamic and engaging tool. The robustness of a review tool is one step toward having a good and fruitful review process. Using socio-economic scenarios and quantitative evidence in policy review processes allows policy actors to develop a great body of information in an all-inclusive manner, keeping all stakeholders engaged. This alone, however, does not guarantee success. State and non-state actors need to invest in trust building if the citizenry is to benefit from the fast approaching private-public partnership frameworks. It is beneficial to work on a single policy document that is already under a review or formulation process. 2016-12-20 2017-02-08T12:49:05Z 2017-02-08T12:49:05Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79793 en Open Access application/pdf Muchunguzi P, Ampaire E, Acosta M, Rutting L, Tumuhereze M, Mwongera C, Okiror JF, van Asten P. 2016. Scenario guided policy planning: processes, comparisons, and lessons from East Africa. CCAFS Info Note. Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). |
| spellingShingle | climate change agriculture food security policies Muchunguzi, Perez Ampaire, Edidah L. Acosta, Mariola Rutting, Lucas Tumuhereze, Martin Mwongera, Caroline Okiror, John Francis Asten, Piet J.A. van Scenario guided policy planning: processes, comparisons, and lessons from East Africa |
| title | Scenario guided policy planning: processes, comparisons, and lessons from East Africa |
| title_full | Scenario guided policy planning: processes, comparisons, and lessons from East Africa |
| title_fullStr | Scenario guided policy planning: processes, comparisons, and lessons from East Africa |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scenario guided policy planning: processes, comparisons, and lessons from East Africa |
| title_short | Scenario guided policy planning: processes, comparisons, and lessons from East Africa |
| title_sort | scenario guided policy planning processes comparisons and lessons from east africa |
| topic | climate change agriculture food security policies |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79793 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT muchunguziperez scenarioguidedpolicyplanningprocessescomparisonsandlessonsfromeastafrica AT ampaireedidahl scenarioguidedpolicyplanningprocessescomparisonsandlessonsfromeastafrica AT acostamariola scenarioguidedpolicyplanningprocessescomparisonsandlessonsfromeastafrica AT ruttinglucas scenarioguidedpolicyplanningprocessescomparisonsandlessonsfromeastafrica AT tumuherezemartin scenarioguidedpolicyplanningprocessescomparisonsandlessonsfromeastafrica AT mwongeracaroline scenarioguidedpolicyplanningprocessescomparisonsandlessonsfromeastafrica AT okirorjohnfrancis scenarioguidedpolicyplanningprocessescomparisonsandlessonsfromeastafrica AT astenpietjavan scenarioguidedpolicyplanningprocessescomparisonsandlessonsfromeastafrica |