Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia

Varietal adoption based on household surveys has mostly relied on farmers’ response to varietal identification. This method can give biased estimates if farmers are unable to identify improved varieties as a group or by name, or give names that do not match with the released variety list. To tack...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maredia, Mywish K., Reyes, B.A., Manu-Aduening, J.A., Dankyi, Ansong A., Hamazakaza, P., Muimui, Kennedy K., Rabbi, Ismail Y., Kulakow, Peter A., Parkes, Elizabeth Y., Abdoulaye, Tahirou, Katungi, E., Raatz, Bodo
Format: Informe técnico
Language:Inglés
Published: Michigan State University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79460
_version_ 1855537430949527552
author Maredia, Mywish K.
Reyes, B.A.
Manu-Aduening, J.A.
Dankyi, Ansong A.
Hamazakaza, P.
Muimui, Kennedy K.
Rabbi, Ismail Y.
Kulakow, Peter A.
Parkes, Elizabeth Y.
Abdoulaye, Tahirou
Katungi, E.
Raatz, Bodo
author_browse Abdoulaye, Tahirou
Dankyi, Ansong A.
Hamazakaza, P.
Katungi, E.
Kulakow, Peter A.
Manu-Aduening, J.A.
Maredia, Mywish K.
Muimui, Kennedy K.
Parkes, Elizabeth Y.
Raatz, Bodo
Rabbi, Ismail Y.
Reyes, B.A.
author_facet Maredia, Mywish K.
Reyes, B.A.
Manu-Aduening, J.A.
Dankyi, Ansong A.
Hamazakaza, P.
Muimui, Kennedy K.
Rabbi, Ismail Y.
Kulakow, Peter A.
Parkes, Elizabeth Y.
Abdoulaye, Tahirou
Katungi, E.
Raatz, Bodo
author_sort Maredia, Mywish K.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Varietal adoption based on household surveys has mostly relied on farmers’ response to varietal identification. This method can give biased estimates if farmers are unable to identify improved varieties as a group or by name, or give names that do not match with the released variety list. To tackle these potential problems other innovative methods have been suggested that require time and resource intensive data collection such as including follow-up questions in the survey instrument to gather information on varietal traits, visiting the field to observe plant characteristics, or collecting sample materials (i.e., photos, seeds/plant tissues) from the farmers for later verification by experts. However, the accuracy of these different methods for identifying varieties grown by farmers to be able to estimate variety specific adoption is unknown. This paper reports the results of two pilot studies conducted in Ghana and Zambia to test and validate some of these different approaches of collecting variety-specific adoption data against the benchmark of DNA-fingerprinting to determine which method can accurately identify released varieties used by farmers. Results suggest large variations in the estimates of varietal adoption obtained by these different methods compared to DNA fingerprinting results. Results also point to potential challenges of these alternative methods of varietal identification, including DNA fingerprinting in a developing country setting. The implications of these results on future adoption and impact studies are discussed.
format Informe técnico
id CGSpace79460
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Michigan State University
publisherStr Michigan State University
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace794602024-03-06T10:16:43Z Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia Maredia, Mywish K. Reyes, B.A. Manu-Aduening, J.A. Dankyi, Ansong A. Hamazakaza, P. Muimui, Kennedy K. Rabbi, Ismail Y. Kulakow, Peter A. Parkes, Elizabeth Y. Abdoulaye, Tahirou Katungi, E. Raatz, Bodo cassava beans dna fingerprinting grain legumes Varietal adoption based on household surveys has mostly relied on farmers’ response to varietal identification. This method can give biased estimates if farmers are unable to identify improved varieties as a group or by name, or give names that do not match with the released variety list. To tackle these potential problems other innovative methods have been suggested that require time and resource intensive data collection such as including follow-up questions in the survey instrument to gather information on varietal traits, visiting the field to observe plant characteristics, or collecting sample materials (i.e., photos, seeds/plant tissues) from the farmers for later verification by experts. However, the accuracy of these different methods for identifying varieties grown by farmers to be able to estimate variety specific adoption is unknown. This paper reports the results of two pilot studies conducted in Ghana and Zambia to test and validate some of these different approaches of collecting variety-specific adoption data against the benchmark of DNA-fingerprinting to determine which method can accurately identify released varieties used by farmers. Results suggest large variations in the estimates of varietal adoption obtained by these different methods compared to DNA fingerprinting results. Results also point to potential challenges of these alternative methods of varietal identification, including DNA fingerprinting in a developing country setting. The implications of these results on future adoption and impact studies are discussed. 2016-10 2017-02-01T12:21:24Z 2017-02-01T12:21:24Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79460 en Limited Access Michigan State University Maredia, M.K., Reyes, B.A., Manu-Aduening, J., Dankyi, A., Hamazakaza, P., Muimui, K., ... & Abdoulaye, T. (2016). Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia (46 p.). Michigan: Michigan State University.
spellingShingle cassava
beans
dna fingerprinting
grain legumes
Maredia, Mywish K.
Reyes, B.A.
Manu-Aduening, J.A.
Dankyi, Ansong A.
Hamazakaza, P.
Muimui, Kennedy K.
Rabbi, Ismail Y.
Kulakow, Peter A.
Parkes, Elizabeth Y.
Abdoulaye, Tahirou
Katungi, E.
Raatz, Bodo
Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia
title Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia
title_full Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia
title_fullStr Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia
title_full_unstemmed Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia
title_short Testing alternative methods of varietal identification using DNA fingerprinting: results of pilot studies in Ghana and Zambia
title_sort testing alternative methods of varietal identification using dna fingerprinting results of pilot studies in ghana and zambia
topic cassava
beans
dna fingerprinting
grain legumes
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79460
work_keys_str_mv AT marediamywishk testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT reyesba testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT manuadueningja testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT dankyiansonga testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT hamazakazap testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT muimuikennedyk testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT rabbiismaily testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT kulakowpetera testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT parkeselizabethy testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT abdoulayetahirou testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT katungie testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia
AT raatzbodo testingalternativemethodsofvarietalidentificationusingdnafingerprintingresultsofpilotstudiesinghanaandzambia