Targeting, bias, and expected impact of complex innovations on developing-country agriculture: Evidence from Malawi
Agronomic analyses of new technologies are often conducted under carefully controlled research station programs or trials managed by self‐selected farmers. Oftentimes, the technologies are then scaled up with minimal evaluation under real‐world conditions. Yet, the interim step between agronomic tri...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79448 |
Ejemplares similares: Targeting, bias, and expected impact of complex innovations on developing-country agriculture: Evidence from Malawi
- Targeting, bias, and expected impact of complex innovations on developing-country agriculture: Evidence from Malawi
- Targeting and bias in participatory research: Evidence from Malawi
- Characterizing adopters of sustainable intensification innovations: Evidence from the Africa RISING (AR) program in Malawi and Tanzania
- Malawi - Africa RISING Baseline Evaluation Survey Questionnaire
- Typology characterization of farmers in Africa RISING sites in Malawi
- Using typologies for technology targeting