Quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed-level ecosystem service quantification: a global sensitivity analysis of the RUSLE

Ecosystem service-support tools are commonly used to guide natural resource management. Often, empirically based models are preferred due to low data requirements, simplicity and clarity. Yet, uncertainty produced by local context or parameter estimation remains poorly quantified and documented. We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Estrada Carmona, Natalia, Harper, E.B., DeClerck, Fabrice A.J., Fremier, Alexander K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Informa UK Limited 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/78565
_version_ 1855542940293660672
author Estrada Carmona, Natalia
Harper, E.B.
DeClerck, Fabrice A.J.
Fremier, Alexander K.
author_browse DeClerck, Fabrice A.J.
Estrada Carmona, Natalia
Fremier, Alexander K.
Harper, E.B.
author_facet Estrada Carmona, Natalia
Harper, E.B.
DeClerck, Fabrice A.J.
Fremier, Alexander K.
author_sort Estrada Carmona, Natalia
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Ecosystem service-support tools are commonly used to guide natural resource management. Often, empirically based models are preferred due to low data requirements, simplicity and clarity. Yet, uncertainty produced by local context or parameter estimation remains poorly quantified and documented. We assessed model uncertainty of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation – RUSLE developed mainly from US data. RUSLE is the most commonly applied model to assess watershed-level soil loss. We performed a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) on RUSLE with four dissimilar datasets to understand uncertainty and to provide recommendations for data collection and model parameterization. The datasets cover varying spatial levels (plot, watershed and continental) and environmental conditions (temperate and tropical). We found cover management and topography create the most uncertainty regardless of environmental conditions or data parameterization techniques. The importance of other RUSLE factors varies across contexts. We argue that model uncertainty could be reduced through better parameterization of cover management and topography factors while avoiding severe soil losses by targeting soil conservation practices in areas where both factors interact and enhance soil loss. We recommend incorporating GSA to assess empirical models’ uncertainty, to guide model parameterization and to target soil conservation efforts.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace78565
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Informa UK Limited
publisherStr Informa UK Limited
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace785652025-11-12T05:49:50Z Quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed-level ecosystem service quantification: a global sensitivity analysis of the RUSLE Estrada Carmona, Natalia Harper, E.B. DeClerck, Fabrice A.J. Fremier, Alexander K. models soil classification soil conservation ecosystem services Ecosystem service-support tools are commonly used to guide natural resource management. Often, empirically based models are preferred due to low data requirements, simplicity and clarity. Yet, uncertainty produced by local context or parameter estimation remains poorly quantified and documented. We assessed model uncertainty of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation – RUSLE developed mainly from US data. RUSLE is the most commonly applied model to assess watershed-level soil loss. We performed a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) on RUSLE with four dissimilar datasets to understand uncertainty and to provide recommendations for data collection and model parameterization. The datasets cover varying spatial levels (plot, watershed and continental) and environmental conditions (temperate and tropical). We found cover management and topography create the most uncertainty regardless of environmental conditions or data parameterization techniques. The importance of other RUSLE factors varies across contexts. We argue that model uncertainty could be reduced through better parameterization of cover management and topography factors while avoiding severe soil losses by targeting soil conservation practices in areas where both factors interact and enhance soil loss. We recommend incorporating GSA to assess empirical models’ uncertainty, to guide model parameterization and to target soil conservation efforts. 2017-01-01 2016-12-30T13:48:22Z 2016-12-30T13:48:22Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/78565 en Open Access application/pdf Informa UK Limited Estrada Carmona, N.; Harper, E.B.; DeClerck, F.; Fremier, A.K. (2016) Quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed-level ecosystem service quantification: a global sensitivity analysis of the RUSLE. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 13(1) p. 40-50 ISSN: 2151-3732
spellingShingle models
soil
classification
soil conservation
ecosystem services
Estrada Carmona, Natalia
Harper, E.B.
DeClerck, Fabrice A.J.
Fremier, Alexander K.
Quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed-level ecosystem service quantification: a global sensitivity analysis of the RUSLE
title Quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed-level ecosystem service quantification: a global sensitivity analysis of the RUSLE
title_full Quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed-level ecosystem service quantification: a global sensitivity analysis of the RUSLE
title_fullStr Quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed-level ecosystem service quantification: a global sensitivity analysis of the RUSLE
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed-level ecosystem service quantification: a global sensitivity analysis of the RUSLE
title_short Quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed-level ecosystem service quantification: a global sensitivity analysis of the RUSLE
title_sort quantifying model uncertainty to improve watershed level ecosystem service quantification a global sensitivity analysis of the rusle
topic models
soil
classification
soil conservation
ecosystem services
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/78565
work_keys_str_mv AT estradacarmonanatalia quantifyingmodeluncertaintytoimprovewatershedlevelecosystemservicequantificationaglobalsensitivityanalysisoftherusle
AT harpereb quantifyingmodeluncertaintytoimprovewatershedlevelecosystemservicequantificationaglobalsensitivityanalysisoftherusle
AT declerckfabriceaj quantifyingmodeluncertaintytoimprovewatershedlevelecosystemservicequantificationaglobalsensitivityanalysisoftherusle
AT fremieralexanderk quantifyingmodeluncertaintytoimprovewatershedlevelecosystemservicequantificationaglobalsensitivityanalysisoftherusle