A potato model inter-comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels
A potato crop multimodel assessment was conducted to quantify variation among models and evaluate responses to climate change. Nine modeling groups simulated agronomic and climatic responses at low‐input (Chinoli, Bolivia and Gisozi, Burundi)‐ and high‐input (Jyndevad, Denmark and Washington, United...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Wiley
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77378 |
| _version_ | 1855528014839808000 |
|---|---|
| author | Fleisher, D.H. Condori, B. Quiróz, R. Alva, A. Asseng, Senthold Barreda, C. Bindi, M. Boote, Kenneth J. Ferrise, R. Franke, A.C. Govindakrishnan, P.M. Harahagazwe, D. Hogenboom, G. Naresh Kumar, S. Merante, P. Nendel, C. Olesen, Jørgen E. Parker, P.S. Raees, D. Raymundo, R. Ruane, Alex C. Stockle, C. Supit, I. Vanuytrecht, Eline Wolf, Joost Woli, P. |
| author_browse | Alva, A. Asseng, Senthold Barreda, C. Bindi, M. Boote, Kenneth J. Condori, B. Ferrise, R. Fleisher, D.H. Franke, A.C. Govindakrishnan, P.M. Harahagazwe, D. Hogenboom, G. Merante, P. Naresh Kumar, S. Nendel, C. Olesen, Jørgen E. Parker, P.S. Quiróz, R. Raees, D. Raymundo, R. Ruane, Alex C. Stockle, C. Supit, I. Vanuytrecht, Eline Wolf, Joost Woli, P. |
| author_facet | Fleisher, D.H. Condori, B. Quiróz, R. Alva, A. Asseng, Senthold Barreda, C. Bindi, M. Boote, Kenneth J. Ferrise, R. Franke, A.C. Govindakrishnan, P.M. Harahagazwe, D. Hogenboom, G. Naresh Kumar, S. Merante, P. Nendel, C. Olesen, Jørgen E. Parker, P.S. Raees, D. Raymundo, R. Ruane, Alex C. Stockle, C. Supit, I. Vanuytrecht, Eline Wolf, Joost Woli, P. |
| author_sort | Fleisher, D.H. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | A potato crop multimodel assessment was conducted to quantify variation among models and evaluate responses to climate change. Nine modeling groups simulated agronomic and climatic responses at low‐input (Chinoli, Bolivia and Gisozi, Burundi)‐ and high‐input (Jyndevad, Denmark and Washington, United States) management sites. Two calibration stages were explored, partial (P1), where experimental dry matter data were not provided, and full (P2). The median model ensemble response outperformed any single model in terms of replicating observed yield across all locations. Uncertainty in simulated yield decreased from 38% to 20% between P1 and P2. Model uncertainty increased with interannual variability, and predictions for all agronomic variables were significantly different from one model to another (P < 0.001). Uncertainty averaged 15% higher for low‐ vs. high‐input sites, with larger differences observed for evapotranspiration (ET), nitrogen uptake, and water use efficiency as compared to dry matter. A minimum of five partial, or three full, calibrated models was required for an ensemble approach to keep variability below that of common field variation. Model variation was not influenced by change in carbon dioxide (C), but increased as much as 41% and 23% for yield and ET, respectively, as temperature (T) or rainfall (W) moved away from historical levels. Increases in T accounted for the highest amount of uncertainty, suggesting that methods and parameters for T sensitivity represent a considerable unknown among models. Using median model ensemble values, yield increased on average 6% per 100‐ppm C, declined 4.6% per °C, and declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites). Differences in predictions due to model representation of light utilization were significant (P < 0.01). These are the first reported results quantifying uncertainty for tuber/root crops and suggest modeling assessments of climate change impact on potato may be improved using an ensemble approach. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace77378 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateRange | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| publisherStr | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace773782025-12-08T09:54:28Z A potato model inter-comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels Fleisher, D.H. Condori, B. Quiróz, R. Alva, A. Asseng, Senthold Barreda, C. Bindi, M. Boote, Kenneth J. Ferrise, R. Franke, A.C. Govindakrishnan, P.M. Harahagazwe, D. Hogenboom, G. Naresh Kumar, S. Merante, P. Nendel, C. Olesen, Jørgen E. Parker, P.S. Raees, D. Raymundo, R. Ruane, Alex C. Stockle, C. Supit, I. Vanuytrecht, Eline Wolf, Joost Woli, P. potatoes simulation models crops climate change A potato crop multimodel assessment was conducted to quantify variation among models and evaluate responses to climate change. Nine modeling groups simulated agronomic and climatic responses at low‐input (Chinoli, Bolivia and Gisozi, Burundi)‐ and high‐input (Jyndevad, Denmark and Washington, United States) management sites. Two calibration stages were explored, partial (P1), where experimental dry matter data were not provided, and full (P2). The median model ensemble response outperformed any single model in terms of replicating observed yield across all locations. Uncertainty in simulated yield decreased from 38% to 20% between P1 and P2. Model uncertainty increased with interannual variability, and predictions for all agronomic variables were significantly different from one model to another (P < 0.001). Uncertainty averaged 15% higher for low‐ vs. high‐input sites, with larger differences observed for evapotranspiration (ET), nitrogen uptake, and water use efficiency as compared to dry matter. A minimum of five partial, or three full, calibrated models was required for an ensemble approach to keep variability below that of common field variation. Model variation was not influenced by change in carbon dioxide (C), but increased as much as 41% and 23% for yield and ET, respectively, as temperature (T) or rainfall (W) moved away from historical levels. Increases in T accounted for the highest amount of uncertainty, suggesting that methods and parameters for T sensitivity represent a considerable unknown among models. Using median model ensemble values, yield increased on average 6% per 100‐ppm C, declined 4.6% per °C, and declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites). Differences in predictions due to model representation of light utilization were significant (P < 0.01). These are the first reported results quantifying uncertainty for tuber/root crops and suggest modeling assessments of climate change impact on potato may be improved using an ensemble approach. 2017-01-01 2016-10-24T13:41:17Z 2016-10-24T13:41:17Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77378 en Limited Access Wiley Fleisher, D.H.; Condori, B.; Quiroz, R.; Alva, A.; Asseng, S.; Barreda, C.; Bindi, M.; Boote, K.J.; Ferrise, R.; Franke, A.C.; Govindakrishnan, P.M.; Harahagazwe, D.; Hogenboom, G.; Naresh Kumar, S.; Merante, P.; Nendel, C.; Olesen, J.E.; Parker, P.S.; Raees, D.; Raymundo, R.; Ruane, A.C.; Stockle, C.; Supit, I.; Vanuytrecht, E.; Wolf, J.; Woli, P. 2017. A potato model inter-comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels. Global Change Biology. (USA). ISSN 1354-1013. 23(3):1258-1281 |
| spellingShingle | potatoes simulation models crops climate change Fleisher, D.H. Condori, B. Quiróz, R. Alva, A. Asseng, Senthold Barreda, C. Bindi, M. Boote, Kenneth J. Ferrise, R. Franke, A.C. Govindakrishnan, P.M. Harahagazwe, D. Hogenboom, G. Naresh Kumar, S. Merante, P. Nendel, C. Olesen, Jørgen E. Parker, P.S. Raees, D. Raymundo, R. Ruane, Alex C. Stockle, C. Supit, I. Vanuytrecht, Eline Wolf, Joost Woli, P. A potato model inter-comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels |
| title | A potato model inter-comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels |
| title_full | A potato model inter-comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels |
| title_fullStr | A potato model inter-comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels |
| title_full_unstemmed | A potato model inter-comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels |
| title_short | A potato model inter-comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels |
| title_sort | potato model inter comparison across varyng climates and productivity levels |
| topic | potatoes simulation models crops climate change |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77378 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fleisherdh apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT condorib apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT quirozr apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT alvaa apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT assengsenthold apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT barredac apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT bindim apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT bootekennethj apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT ferriser apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT frankeac apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT govindakrishnanpm apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT harahagazwed apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT hogenboomg apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT nareshkumars apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT merantep apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT nendelc apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT olesenjørgene apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT parkerps apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT raeesd apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT raymundor apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT ruanealexc apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT stocklec apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT supiti apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT vanuytrechteline apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT wolfjoost apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT wolip apotatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT fleisherdh potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT condorib potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT quirozr potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT alvaa potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT assengsenthold potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT barredac potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT bindim potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT bootekennethj potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT ferriser potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT frankeac potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT govindakrishnanpm potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT harahagazwed potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT hogenboomg potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT nareshkumars potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT merantep potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT nendelc potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT olesenjørgene potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT parkerps potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT raeesd potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT raymundor potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT ruanealexc potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT stocklec potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT supiti potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT vanuytrechteline potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT wolfjoost potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels AT wolip potatomodelintercomparisonacrossvaryngclimatesandproductivitylevels |