Decentralised water governance in Zimbabwe: disorder within order

The Decentralised Water reform process in Zimbabwe has largely been informed by the Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) process based on the 1992 Dublin Principles onWater. The attempt to reform one sector (water), under the IWRM rubric, when other key sectors are in disarray (agriculture,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mapedza, Everisto D., Manzungu, Emmanuel, Rosen, T., Ncube, P., van Koppen, Barbara
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77049
_version_ 1855537430569943040
author Mapedza, Everisto D.
Manzungu, Emmanuel
Rosen, T.
Ncube, P.
van Koppen, Barbara
author_browse Manzungu, Emmanuel
Mapedza, Everisto D.
Ncube, P.
Rosen, T.
van Koppen, Barbara
author_facet Mapedza, Everisto D.
Manzungu, Emmanuel
Rosen, T.
Ncube, P.
van Koppen, Barbara
author_sort Mapedza, Everisto D.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The Decentralised Water reform process in Zimbabwe has largely been informed by the Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) process based on the 1992 Dublin Principles onWater. The attempt to reform one sector (water), under the IWRM rubric, when other key sectors are in disarray (agriculture, energy) and when social and government institutions, in general, are not functioning as they should, made it more complicated. The decentralised water reform process, with support from a number of donors, was perceived to be a technical process which would result in better water management in Zimbabwe. The research in Zimbabwe, however, shows that instead of establishing order within the water sector, the reform process has largely been disorderly since it downplays the political nature of the water reform process. In attempting to change the water legislation, the reform brought out the different and competing interests on water. The economic crisis, the contested land reform process that ensued, resulted in disorder which benefited those who are politically connected. This paper contributes to the scholarship on the need to have a better political economy approach to development interventions such as water reform as they have to play out in political, social and economic contexts which will impact on human livelihoods.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace77049
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace770492024-08-27T10:36:59Z Decentralised water governance in Zimbabwe: disorder within order Mapedza, Everisto D. Manzungu, Emmanuel Rosen, T. Ncube, P. van Koppen, Barbara water governance decentralization land reform political aspects economic aspects social aspects integrated management water resources water management water users catchment areas The Decentralised Water reform process in Zimbabwe has largely been informed by the Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) process based on the 1992 Dublin Principles onWater. The attempt to reform one sector (water), under the IWRM rubric, when other key sectors are in disarray (agriculture, energy) and when social and government institutions, in general, are not functioning as they should, made it more complicated. The decentralised water reform process, with support from a number of donors, was perceived to be a technical process which would result in better water management in Zimbabwe. The research in Zimbabwe, however, shows that instead of establishing order within the water sector, the reform process has largely been disorderly since it downplays the political nature of the water reform process. In attempting to change the water legislation, the reform brought out the different and competing interests on water. The economic crisis, the contested land reform process that ensued, resulted in disorder which benefited those who are politically connected. This paper contributes to the scholarship on the need to have a better political economy approach to development interventions such as water reform as they have to play out in political, social and economic contexts which will impact on human livelihoods. 2016-11 2016-09-15T04:23:11Z 2016-09-15T04:23:11Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77049 en Limited Access Elsevier Mapedza, Everisto; Manzungu, E.; Rosen, T.; Ncube, P.; van Koppen, Barbara. 2016. Decentralised water governance in Zimbabwe: disorder within order. Water Resources and Rural Development, 11p. (Online first) doi: 10.1016/j.wrr.2016.05.001
spellingShingle water governance
decentralization
land reform
political aspects
economic aspects
social aspects
integrated management
water resources
water management
water users
catchment areas
Mapedza, Everisto D.
Manzungu, Emmanuel
Rosen, T.
Ncube, P.
van Koppen, Barbara
Decentralised water governance in Zimbabwe: disorder within order
title Decentralised water governance in Zimbabwe: disorder within order
title_full Decentralised water governance in Zimbabwe: disorder within order
title_fullStr Decentralised water governance in Zimbabwe: disorder within order
title_full_unstemmed Decentralised water governance in Zimbabwe: disorder within order
title_short Decentralised water governance in Zimbabwe: disorder within order
title_sort decentralised water governance in zimbabwe disorder within order
topic water governance
decentralization
land reform
political aspects
economic aspects
social aspects
integrated management
water resources
water management
water users
catchment areas
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77049
work_keys_str_mv AT mapedzaeveristod decentralisedwatergovernanceinzimbabwedisorderwithinorder
AT manzunguemmanuel decentralisedwatergovernanceinzimbabwedisorderwithinorder
AT rosent decentralisedwatergovernanceinzimbabwedisorderwithinorder
AT ncubep decentralisedwatergovernanceinzimbabwedisorderwithinorder
AT vankoppenbarbara decentralisedwatergovernanceinzimbabwedisorderwithinorder