Bias-correction in the CCAFS-Climate Portal: A description of methodologies

Global Climate Models (GCMs) have been the primary source of information for constructing climate scenarios, and they provide the basis for climate change impacts assessments of climate change at all scales, from local to global. However, impact studies rarely use GCM outputs directly because errors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Navarro Racines, Carlos Eduardo, Tarapues Montenegro, Jaime Eduardo
Format: Informe técnico
Language:Inglés
Published: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76609
_version_ 1855540665637666816
author Navarro Racines, Carlos Eduardo
Tarapues Montenegro, Jaime Eduardo
author_browse Navarro Racines, Carlos Eduardo
Tarapues Montenegro, Jaime Eduardo
author_facet Navarro Racines, Carlos Eduardo
Tarapues Montenegro, Jaime Eduardo
author_sort Navarro Racines, Carlos Eduardo
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Global Climate Models (GCMs) have been the primary source of information for constructing climate scenarios, and they provide the basis for climate change impacts assessments of climate change at all scales, from local to global. However, impact studies rarely use GCM outputs directly because errors in GCM simulations relative to historical observations are large (Ramirez-Villegas et al. 2013), and because the spatial resolution is generally too coarse to satisfy the requirements for finer-scale impact studies. More specifically, the typical GCM spatial resolution (50 km or even more) is not practical for assessing agricultural landscapes, particularly in the tropics, where orographic and climatic conditions vary significantly across relatively small distances (Tabor & Williams, 2010). Hence, it is important to bias-correct and downscale the raw climate model outputs in order to produce climate projections that are better fit for agricultural modeling. Here we describe three different calibration approaches to produce reliable daily climate for future periods, employed in a new interface in CCAFS-Climate portal (www.ccafs-climate.org/data_bias_corrected/), as follows: (a) bias correction (or nudging) (Hawkins et al., 2013), (b) change factor (Hawkins et al., 2013) and (c) Quantile Mapping (Gudmundsson et al., 2012). In addition, briefly describe some observational datasets relevant to agricultural modeling and employed as the historical observations for the calibration methods mentioned here.
format Informe técnico
id CGSpace76609
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
publisherStr CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace766092025-12-10T12:47:19Z Bias-correction in the CCAFS-Climate Portal: A description of methodologies Navarro Racines, Carlos Eduardo Tarapues Montenegro, Jaime Eduardo climate change agriculture food security biodiversity certification evaluation evidence-based conservation monitoring voluntary sustainability standards biodiversidad certificación conservación con base en evidencias evaluación monitoreo normas voluntarias de sostenibilidad Global Climate Models (GCMs) have been the primary source of information for constructing climate scenarios, and they provide the basis for climate change impacts assessments of climate change at all scales, from local to global. However, impact studies rarely use GCM outputs directly because errors in GCM simulations relative to historical observations are large (Ramirez-Villegas et al. 2013), and because the spatial resolution is generally too coarse to satisfy the requirements for finer-scale impact studies. More specifically, the typical GCM spatial resolution (50 km or even more) is not practical for assessing agricultural landscapes, particularly in the tropics, where orographic and climatic conditions vary significantly across relatively small distances (Tabor & Williams, 2010). Hence, it is important to bias-correct and downscale the raw climate model outputs in order to produce climate projections that are better fit for agricultural modeling. Here we describe three different calibration approaches to produce reliable daily climate for future periods, employed in a new interface in CCAFS-Climate portal (www.ccafs-climate.org/data_bias_corrected/), as follows: (a) bias correction (or nudging) (Hawkins et al., 2013), (b) change factor (Hawkins et al., 2013) and (c) Quantile Mapping (Gudmundsson et al., 2012). In addition, briefly describe some observational datasets relevant to agricultural modeling and employed as the historical observations for the calibration methods mentioned here. 2015-08-25 2016-08-25T11:55:43Z 2016-08-25T11:55:43Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76609 en Open Access application/pdf CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Navarro CE, Tarapues JE. 2015. Bias-correction in the CCAFS-Climate Portal: A description of methodologies. Decision and Policy Analysis (DAPA) Research Area. Cali, Colombia: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT).
spellingShingle climate change
agriculture
food security
biodiversity
certification
evaluation
evidence-based conservation
monitoring
voluntary sustainability standards
biodiversidad
certificación
conservación con base en evidencias
evaluación
monitoreo
normas voluntarias de sostenibilidad
Navarro Racines, Carlos Eduardo
Tarapues Montenegro, Jaime Eduardo
Bias-correction in the CCAFS-Climate Portal: A description of methodologies
title Bias-correction in the CCAFS-Climate Portal: A description of methodologies
title_full Bias-correction in the CCAFS-Climate Portal: A description of methodologies
title_fullStr Bias-correction in the CCAFS-Climate Portal: A description of methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Bias-correction in the CCAFS-Climate Portal: A description of methodologies
title_short Bias-correction in the CCAFS-Climate Portal: A description of methodologies
title_sort bias correction in the ccafs climate portal a description of methodologies
topic climate change
agriculture
food security
biodiversity
certification
evaluation
evidence-based conservation
monitoring
voluntary sustainability standards
biodiversidad
certificación
conservación con base en evidencias
evaluación
monitoreo
normas voluntarias de sostenibilidad
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76609
work_keys_str_mv AT navarroracinescarloseduardo biascorrectionintheccafsclimateportaladescriptionofmethodologies
AT tarapuesmontenegrojaimeeduardo biascorrectionintheccafsclimateportaladescriptionofmethodologies