A comparison of malaria prevalence, control and management strategies in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in eastern Kenya

Background This study was conducted in Bura irrigation scheme in Tana River County and the pastoral area in Ijara, Garissa County in the eastern Kenya to establish the knowledge, attitude and practices on malaria transmission, control and management, and determine malaria prevalence and the associat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muriuki, J.M., Kitala, P., Muchemi, G., Njeru, I., Karanja, J., Bett, Bernard K.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76507
_version_ 1855525173197799424
author Muriuki, J.M.
Kitala, P.
Muchemi, G.
Njeru, I.
Karanja, J.
Bett, Bernard K.
author_browse Bett, Bernard K.
Karanja, J.
Kitala, P.
Muchemi, G.
Muriuki, J.M.
Njeru, I.
author_facet Muriuki, J.M.
Kitala, P.
Muchemi, G.
Njeru, I.
Karanja, J.
Bett, Bernard K.
author_sort Muriuki, J.M.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Background This study was conducted in Bura irrigation scheme in Tana River County and the pastoral area in Ijara, Garissa County in the eastern Kenya to establish the knowledge, attitude and practices on malaria transmission, control and management, and determine malaria prevalence and the associated risk factors. Methods A cross sectional survey design that involved 493 randomly selected people from 334 households was used between November and December 2013. All the randomly selected people were screened for malaria parasites using rapid diagnostic test (RDT)—Carestart™ malaria HRP2 (pf) kit. A questionnaire was administered to determine potential risk factors and perceptions on malaria exposure within a period of 2 months prior to the survey. Two logistic regression models were fitted to the data; one used the RDT results while the other used data from the questionnaire survey. Results Using RDT, the prevalence of malaria was 4.68 % (95 % CI: 1.48–7.88 %) and 0.31 % (−0.30 to 0.92 %) in irrigated and non-irrigated areas, respectively. From the questionnaires, 14.62 % (9.27–19.97 %) and 23.91 % (19.23–28.60 %) of the participants perceived to have had malaria in the irrigated and pastoral areas, respectively. The main malaria control measure was the use of bed nets: average of three nets per household in Bura irrigation scheme and one in Ijara. Artemether–lumefantrine was the main drug of choice mainly in the irrigated area while sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine was likely to be used in the non-irrigated area. Households located >5 km from the nearest health facility had higher prevalence of Plasmodium infection than those located ≤5 km. Conclusion The residents of Bura irrigation scheme were more likely to be infected compared to those living in the non-irrigated area of Ijara. However, those in the non-irrigated area were more likely to be treated or use over-the-counter medication for perceived malaria illnesses compared to those in the irrigated area. There is a need, therefore, to formulate effective ways of managing malaria especially in irrigated areas and build capacity on differential diagnosis for malaria, especially in the pastoral areas.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace76507
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace765072024-05-01T08:17:23Z A comparison of malaria prevalence, control and management strategies in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in eastern Kenya Muriuki, J.M. Kitala, P. Muchemi, G. Njeru, I. Karanja, J. Bett, Bernard K. health Background This study was conducted in Bura irrigation scheme in Tana River County and the pastoral area in Ijara, Garissa County in the eastern Kenya to establish the knowledge, attitude and practices on malaria transmission, control and management, and determine malaria prevalence and the associated risk factors. Methods A cross sectional survey design that involved 493 randomly selected people from 334 households was used between November and December 2013. All the randomly selected people were screened for malaria parasites using rapid diagnostic test (RDT)—Carestart™ malaria HRP2 (pf) kit. A questionnaire was administered to determine potential risk factors and perceptions on malaria exposure within a period of 2 months prior to the survey. Two logistic regression models were fitted to the data; one used the RDT results while the other used data from the questionnaire survey. Results Using RDT, the prevalence of malaria was 4.68 % (95 % CI: 1.48–7.88 %) and 0.31 % (−0.30 to 0.92 %) in irrigated and non-irrigated areas, respectively. From the questionnaires, 14.62 % (9.27–19.97 %) and 23.91 % (19.23–28.60 %) of the participants perceived to have had malaria in the irrigated and pastoral areas, respectively. The main malaria control measure was the use of bed nets: average of three nets per household in Bura irrigation scheme and one in Ijara. Artemether–lumefantrine was the main drug of choice mainly in the irrigated area while sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine was likely to be used in the non-irrigated area. Households located >5 km from the nearest health facility had higher prevalence of Plasmodium infection than those located ≤5 km. Conclusion The residents of Bura irrigation scheme were more likely to be infected compared to those living in the non-irrigated area of Ijara. However, those in the non-irrigated area were more likely to be treated or use over-the-counter medication for perceived malaria illnesses compared to those in the irrigated area. There is a need, therefore, to formulate effective ways of managing malaria especially in irrigated areas and build capacity on differential diagnosis for malaria, especially in the pastoral areas. 2016-12 2016-08-17T06:49:27Z 2016-08-17T06:49:27Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76507 en Open Access Springer Muriuki, J.M., Kitala, P., Muchemi, G., Njeru, I., Karanja, J. and Bett, B. 2016. A comparison of malaria prevalence, control and management strategies in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in eastern Kenya. Malaria Journal 15: 402.
spellingShingle health
Muriuki, J.M.
Kitala, P.
Muchemi, G.
Njeru, I.
Karanja, J.
Bett, Bernard K.
A comparison of malaria prevalence, control and management strategies in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in eastern Kenya
title A comparison of malaria prevalence, control and management strategies in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in eastern Kenya
title_full A comparison of malaria prevalence, control and management strategies in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in eastern Kenya
title_fullStr A comparison of malaria prevalence, control and management strategies in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in eastern Kenya
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of malaria prevalence, control and management strategies in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in eastern Kenya
title_short A comparison of malaria prevalence, control and management strategies in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in eastern Kenya
title_sort comparison of malaria prevalence control and management strategies in irrigated and non irrigated areas in eastern kenya
topic health
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76507
work_keys_str_mv AT muriukijm acomparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT kitalap acomparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT muchemig acomparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT njerui acomparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT karanjaj acomparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT bettbernardk acomparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT muriukijm comparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT kitalap comparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT muchemig comparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT njerui comparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT karanjaj comparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya
AT bettbernardk comparisonofmalariaprevalencecontrolandmanagementstrategiesinirrigatedandnonirrigatedareasineasternkenya