Donor demands and uses for evidence of research impact - the case of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)
Ex post impact assessment (epIA) is often promoted as a method of illustrating to funding bodies that agricultural research investments are effectively contributing to the achievement of development goals. In response, impact assessors have produced a great deal of evidence that international agr...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Informe técnico |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
CGIAR System Organization
2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76143 |
Ejemplares similares: Donor demands and uses for evidence of research impact - the case of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)
- Donor Demands and Uses for Evidence of Research Impact - the Case of the CGIAR
- Funding proposal 1990: for presentation to the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
- Assessing the Contribution of Impact Assessment to Donor Decisions for International Agricultural Research
- Reforming the research policy and impact culture in the CGIAR: Integrating science and systemic capacity development
- ISPC Portfolio-Level Commentary on CRP-II Full Proposals 2017-2022
- CGIAR and NARS partner research in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence of impact to date