Response to Sommer et al. (2014) Fertiliser use is not required as a fourth principle to define conservation agriculture
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/76062 |
Similar Items: Response to Sommer et al. (2014) Fertiliser use is not required as a fourth principle to define conservation agriculture
- A fourth principle is required to define conservation agriculture in subSaharan Africa: the appropriate use of fertilizer to enhance crop productivity
- Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation agriculture: Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014) ‘A fourth principle is required to define conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: The appropriate use of fertilizer to enhance crop productivity’
- Yield gaps, nutrient use efficiencies and response to fertilisers by maize across heterogenous smallholder farms of western Kenya
- Response to the discussion letter of Lassaletta and Aguilera “soil carbon sequestration is a climate stabilization wedge: Comments on Sommer and Bossio (2014)”
- Precision fertiliser application in Asia
- Does the fertilisation strategy affect the long-term legacy phosphorus dynamic?