State regulations in groundwater management: they bark but do they bite?
Because of the logics of both colonization or de-colonization, the need to counter the anarchy of groundwater use, or the dissemination of global 'best practices' of IWRM, states have often assumed full ownership or custody of groundwater. Regulating groundwater use includes giving drilling and abst...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference Paper |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/75793 |
Similar Items: State regulations in groundwater management: they bark but do they bite?
- Groundwater governance: a synthesis. [Project report of the Groundwater Governance in the Arab World - Taking Stock and Addressing the Challenges]
- Why is state-centered groundwater governance largely ineffective?: a review
- Groundwater governance in the Middle East and North Africa. [Project report of the Groundwater Governance in the Arab World - Taking Stock and Addressing the Challenges].
- Groundwater governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. [Project report of the Groundwater Governance in the Arab World - Taking Stock and Addressing the Challenges].
- Groundwater governance in Europe. [Project report of the Groundwater Governance in the Arab World - Taking Stock and Addressing the Challenges].
- Chronicle of a demise foretold: state vs. local groundwater management in Texas and the high plains aquifer system