Strengthening the food systems governance evidence base: Supporting commensurability of research through a systematic review of methods
Governance of food systems is a poorly understood determinant of food security. Much scholarship on food systems governance is non-empirical, while existing research is often case study-based and theoretically and methodologically incommensurable. This frustrates aggregation of evidence and gener...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo preliminar |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/72720 |
Similar Items: Strengthening the food systems governance evidence base: Supporting commensurability of research through a systematic review of methods
- Governance of food systems across scales in times of social-ecological change: a review of indicators
- Strengthening the food systems governance evidence base: Supporting commensurability of research through a systematic review of methods
- Systematic Review of Methods in Low-Consensus Fields: Supporting Commensuration through `Construct-Centered Methods Aggregation’ in the Case of Climate Change Vulnerability Research
- A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change in developing country agriculture
- A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change: in search of transparency, coherence and comparability
- Advancing the research agenda on food systems governance and transformation