Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes

The current project has sought to assess i) the potential of agricultural biodiversity-focused PES to serve as a cost-effective and socially equitable domesticated diversity conservation incentive scheme, as well as ii) how economic incentive mechanisms such as PES can be designed to build on and co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Drucker, Adam G., Narloch, U., Pascual, U., Soto, J.L., Pinto, M., Midler, E., Valdivia, E., Rojas, W.
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/70126
_version_ 1855534151203028992
author Drucker, Adam G.
Narloch, U.
Pascual, U.
Soto, J.L.
Pinto, M.
Midler, E.
Valdivia, E.
Rojas, W.
author_browse Drucker, Adam G.
Midler, E.
Narloch, U.
Pascual, U.
Pinto, M.
Rojas, W.
Soto, J.L.
Valdivia, E.
author_facet Drucker, Adam G.
Narloch, U.
Pascual, U.
Soto, J.L.
Pinto, M.
Midler, E.
Valdivia, E.
Rojas, W.
author_sort Drucker, Adam G.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The current project has sought to assess i) the potential of agricultural biodiversity-focused PES to serve as a cost-effective and socially equitable domesticated diversity conservation incentive scheme, as well as ii) how economic incentive mechanisms such as PES can be designed to build on and complement local institutions of collective action. Results are presented from pilot Payment for Agrobiodiversity Conservation (PACS) schemes and framed field experiments implemented in the Bolivian and Peruvian Andes aimed at sustaining diversity within quinoa, a traditional Andean grain. Findings indicate that opportunity costs of conservation vary widely not only between the two study sites, but also between community-based groups within each site. This creates opportunities to minimize intervention costs by selecting least-cost conserving farmers. However, as shown with respect to the role of wealth and cooperation in determining opportunity costs, this also has implications for the type of farmer to be included in the conservation programme. Promisingly, depending on the fairness principle deemed most important in the local context, there does not necessarily have to be a significant trade-off between the schemes’ potential cost-effectiveness and equity outcomes. The observed behavior in the farmer experimental games further supports such findings and suggests that understanding farmer perceptions of fairness can have important implications for the design of conservation incentive mechanisms, particularly given the important influence of such perceptions on the pro-social behavior that underlies much de facto conservation. Incentive mechanisms, such as PACS, that can support socially valued ends not only by harnessing selfish preferences to public ends but also by evoking public-spirited motives are also more likely to be sustainable over the long-term. The use of PACS incentives for the maintenance of traditional crop varieties and the improvement of smallholder farmer livelihoods thus appears promising for further development and up-scaling.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace70126
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace701262025-11-05T07:17:06Z Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes Drucker, Adam G. Narloch, U. Pascual, U. Soto, J.L. Pinto, M. Midler, E. Valdivia, E. Rojas, W. development biodiversity agrobiodiversity collective action economic development field experimentation cost benefit analysis equity quinoa agriculture incentives conservation crowding effects experimental design ecosystem services The current project has sought to assess i) the potential of agricultural biodiversity-focused PES to serve as a cost-effective and socially equitable domesticated diversity conservation incentive scheme, as well as ii) how economic incentive mechanisms such as PES can be designed to build on and complement local institutions of collective action. Results are presented from pilot Payment for Agrobiodiversity Conservation (PACS) schemes and framed field experiments implemented in the Bolivian and Peruvian Andes aimed at sustaining diversity within quinoa, a traditional Andean grain. Findings indicate that opportunity costs of conservation vary widely not only between the two study sites, but also between community-based groups within each site. This creates opportunities to minimize intervention costs by selecting least-cost conserving farmers. However, as shown with respect to the role of wealth and cooperation in determining opportunity costs, this also has implications for the type of farmer to be included in the conservation programme. Promisingly, depending on the fairness principle deemed most important in the local context, there does not necessarily have to be a significant trade-off between the schemes’ potential cost-effectiveness and equity outcomes. The observed behavior in the farmer experimental games further supports such findings and suggests that understanding farmer perceptions of fairness can have important implications for the design of conservation incentive mechanisms, particularly given the important influence of such perceptions on the pro-social behavior that underlies much de facto conservation. Incentive mechanisms, such as PACS, that can support socially valued ends not only by harnessing selfish preferences to public ends but also by evoking public-spirited motives are also more likely to be sustainable over the long-term. The use of PACS incentives for the maintenance of traditional crop varieties and the improvement of smallholder farmer livelihoods thus appears promising for further development and up-scaling. 2015 2016-01-25T10:12:43Z 2016-01-25T10:12:43Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/70126 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Drucker, A.G.; Narloch, U.; Pascual, U.; Soto, J.L.; Pinto, M.; Midler, E.; Valdivia, E.; Rojas, W. (2015) Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes. CAPRi Working Paper No. 118. International Food Policy Research Institute. 61 p. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/70126
spellingShingle development
biodiversity
agrobiodiversity
collective action
economic development
field experimentation
cost benefit analysis
equity
quinoa
agriculture
incentives
conservation
crowding effects
experimental design
ecosystem services
Drucker, Adam G.
Narloch, U.
Pascual, U.
Soto, J.L.
Pinto, M.
Midler, E.
Valdivia, E.
Rojas, W.
Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes
title Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes
title_full Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes
title_fullStr Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes
title_full_unstemmed Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes
title_short Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes
title_sort domestication of payments for ecosystem services new evidence from the andes
topic development
biodiversity
agrobiodiversity
collective action
economic development
field experimentation
cost benefit analysis
equity
quinoa
agriculture
incentives
conservation
crowding effects
experimental design
ecosystem services
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/70126
work_keys_str_mv AT druckeradamg domesticationofpaymentsforecosystemservicesnewevidencefromtheandes
AT narlochu domesticationofpaymentsforecosystemservicesnewevidencefromtheandes
AT pascualu domesticationofpaymentsforecosystemservicesnewevidencefromtheandes
AT sotojl domesticationofpaymentsforecosystemservicesnewevidencefromtheandes
AT pintom domesticationofpaymentsforecosystemservicesnewevidencefromtheandes
AT midlere domesticationofpaymentsforecosystemservicesnewevidencefromtheandes
AT valdiviae domesticationofpaymentsforecosystemservicesnewevidencefromtheandes
AT rojasw domesticationofpaymentsforecosystemservicesnewevidencefromtheandes