Multi-locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) in Kenya

Rhipicephalus appendiculatus is an important tick vector of several pathogens and parasitizes domestic and wild animals across eastern and southern Africa. However, its inherent genetic variation and population structure is poorly understood. To investigate whether mammalian host species, geographic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanduma, Esther G., Mwacharo, Joram M., Mwaura, S., Njuguna, J.N., Nzuki, I., Kinyanjui, P.W., Githaka, Naftaly W., Heyne, H., Hanotte, Olivier H., Skilton, Robert A., Bishop, Richard P.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Elsevier 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/69234
_version_ 1855515387669512192
author Kanduma, Esther G.
Mwacharo, Joram M.
Mwaura, S.
Njuguna, J.N.
Nzuki, I.
Kinyanjui, P.W.
Githaka, Naftaly W.
Heyne, H.
Hanotte, Olivier H.
Skilton, Robert A.
Bishop, Richard P.
author_browse Bishop, Richard P.
Githaka, Naftaly W.
Hanotte, Olivier H.
Heyne, H.
Kanduma, Esther G.
Kinyanjui, P.W.
Mwacharo, Joram M.
Mwaura, S.
Njuguna, J.N.
Nzuki, I.
Skilton, Robert A.
author_facet Kanduma, Esther G.
Mwacharo, Joram M.
Mwaura, S.
Njuguna, J.N.
Nzuki, I.
Kinyanjui, P.W.
Githaka, Naftaly W.
Heyne, H.
Hanotte, Olivier H.
Skilton, Robert A.
Bishop, Richard P.
author_sort Kanduma, Esther G.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Rhipicephalus appendiculatus is an important tick vector of several pathogens and parasitizes domestic and wild animals across eastern and southern Africa. However, its inherent genetic variation and population structure is poorly understood. To investigate whether mammalian host species, geographic separation and resulting reproductive isolation, or a combination of these, define the genetic structure of R. appendiculatus, we analyzed multi-locus genotype data from 392 individuals from 10 geographic locations in Kenya generated in an earlier study. These ticks were associated with three types of mammalian host situations; (1) cattle grazing systems, (2) cattle and wildlife co-grazing systems (3) wildlife grazing systems without livestock. We also analyzed data from 460 individuals from 10 populations maintained as closed laboratory stocks and 117 individuals from five other species in the genus Rhipicephalus. The pattern of genotypes observed indicated low levels of genetic differentiation between the ten field populations (FST = 0.014 ± 0.002) and a lack of genetic divergence corresponding to the degree of separation of the geographic sampling locations. There was also no clear association of particular tick genotypes with specific host species. This is consistent with tick dispersal over large geographic ranges and lack of host specificity. In contrast, the 10 laboratory populations (FST = 0.248 ± 0.015) and the five other species of Rhipicephalus (FST = 0.368 ± 0.032) were strongly differentiated into distinct genetic groups. Some laboratory bred populations diverged markedly from their field counterparts in spite of originally being sampled from the same geographic locations. Our results demonstrate a lack of defined population genetic differentiation in field populations of the generalist R. appendiculatus in Kenya, which may be a result of the frequent anthropogenic movement of livestock and mobility of its several wildlife hosts between different locations.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace69234
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace692342024-01-09T09:04:44Z Multi-locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) in Kenya Kanduma, Esther G. Mwacharo, Joram M. Mwaura, S. Njuguna, J.N. Nzuki, I. Kinyanjui, P.W. Githaka, Naftaly W. Heyne, H. Hanotte, Olivier H. Skilton, Robert A. Bishop, Richard P. cattle livestock tickborne diseases wild animals infectious diseases microbiology parasitology Rhipicephalus appendiculatus is an important tick vector of several pathogens and parasitizes domestic and wild animals across eastern and southern Africa. However, its inherent genetic variation and population structure is poorly understood. To investigate whether mammalian host species, geographic separation and resulting reproductive isolation, or a combination of these, define the genetic structure of R. appendiculatus, we analyzed multi-locus genotype data from 392 individuals from 10 geographic locations in Kenya generated in an earlier study. These ticks were associated with three types of mammalian host situations; (1) cattle grazing systems, (2) cattle and wildlife co-grazing systems (3) wildlife grazing systems without livestock. We also analyzed data from 460 individuals from 10 populations maintained as closed laboratory stocks and 117 individuals from five other species in the genus Rhipicephalus. The pattern of genotypes observed indicated low levels of genetic differentiation between the ten field populations (FST = 0.014 ± 0.002) and a lack of genetic divergence corresponding to the degree of separation of the geographic sampling locations. There was also no clear association of particular tick genotypes with specific host species. This is consistent with tick dispersal over large geographic ranges and lack of host specificity. In contrast, the 10 laboratory populations (FST = 0.248 ± 0.015) and the five other species of Rhipicephalus (FST = 0.368 ± 0.032) were strongly differentiated into distinct genetic groups. Some laboratory bred populations diverged markedly from their field counterparts in spite of originally being sampled from the same geographic locations. Our results demonstrate a lack of defined population genetic differentiation in field populations of the generalist R. appendiculatus in Kenya, which may be a result of the frequent anthropogenic movement of livestock and mobility of its several wildlife hosts between different locations. 2016-02 2015-12-14T18:38:09Z 2015-12-14T18:38:09Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/69234 en Limited Access Elsevier Kanduma, E.G., Mwacharo, J. M., Mwaura, S., Njuguna, J.N., Nzuki, I., Kinyanjui, P.W., Githaka, N., Heyne, H., Hanotte, O., Skilton, R.A. and Bishop, R.P. 2016. Multi-locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) in Kenya. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 7(1): 26-35.
spellingShingle cattle
livestock
tickborne diseases
wild animals
infectious diseases
microbiology
parasitology
Kanduma, Esther G.
Mwacharo, Joram M.
Mwaura, S.
Njuguna, J.N.
Nzuki, I.
Kinyanjui, P.W.
Githaka, Naftaly W.
Heyne, H.
Hanotte, Olivier H.
Skilton, Robert A.
Bishop, Richard P.
Multi-locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) in Kenya
title Multi-locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) in Kenya
title_full Multi-locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) in Kenya
title_fullStr Multi-locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Multi-locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) in Kenya
title_short Multi-locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) in Kenya
title_sort multi locus genotyping reveals absence of genetic structure in field populations of the brown ear tick rhipicephalus appendiculatus in kenya
topic cattle
livestock
tickborne diseases
wild animals
infectious diseases
microbiology
parasitology
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/69234
work_keys_str_mv AT kandumaestherg multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT mwacharojoramm multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT mwauras multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT njugunajn multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT nzukii multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT kinyanjuipw multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT githakanaftalyw multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT heyneh multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT hanotteolivierh multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT skiltonroberta multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya
AT bishoprichardp multilocusgenotypingrevealsabsenceofgeneticstructureinfieldpopulationsofthebrowneartickrhipicephalusappendiculatusinkenya