Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices

This study provides estimates of the net GHG mitigation potential of a selected range of management practices in the world’s native and cultivated grazing lands. The Century and Daycent models are used to calculate the changes in soil carbon stocks, soil N2O emissions, and forage removals by ruminan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henderson, Benjamin B., Gerber, Pierre J., Hilinski, T.E., Falcucci, A., Ojima, D.S., Salvatore, M., Conant, Richard T.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/65660
_version_ 1855524243366739968
author Henderson, Benjamin B.
Gerber, Pierre J.
Hilinski, T.E.
Falcucci, A.
Ojima, D.S.
Salvatore, M.
Conant, Richard T.
author_browse Conant, Richard T.
Falcucci, A.
Gerber, Pierre J.
Henderson, Benjamin B.
Hilinski, T.E.
Ojima, D.S.
Salvatore, M.
author_facet Henderson, Benjamin B.
Gerber, Pierre J.
Hilinski, T.E.
Falcucci, A.
Ojima, D.S.
Salvatore, M.
Conant, Richard T.
author_sort Henderson, Benjamin B.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This study provides estimates of the net GHG mitigation potential of a selected range of management practices in the world’s native and cultivated grazing lands. The Century and Daycent models are used to calculate the changes in soil carbon stocks, soil N2O emissions, and forage removals by ruminants associated with these practices. GLEAM is used in combination with these models to establish grazing area boundaries and to parameterize links between forage consumption, animal production and animal GHG emissions. This study provides an alternative to the usual approach of extrapolating from a small number of field studies and by modeling the linkage between soil, forage and animals it sheds new light on the net mitigation potential of C sequestration practices in the world’s grazing lands. Three different mitigation practices are assessed in this study, namely, improved grazing management, legume sowing and N fertilization. We estimate that optimization of grazing pressure could sequester 148 Tg CO2 yr−1. The soil C sequestration potential of 203 Tg CO2 yr−1 for legume sowing was higher than for improved grazing management, despite being applied over a much smaller total area. However, N2O emissions from legumes were estimated to offset 28% of its global C sequestration benefits, in CO2 equivalent terms. Conversely, N2O emissions from N fertilization exceeded soil C sequestration, in all regions. Our estimated potential for increasing C stocks though in grazing lands is lower than earlier worldwide estimates (Smith et al., 2007 and Lal, 2004), mainly due to the much smaller grazing land area over which we estimate mitigation practices to be effective. A big concern is the high risk of the practices, particularly legumes, increasing soil-based GHGs if applied outside of this relatively small effective area. More work is needed to develop indicators, based on biophysical and management characteristics of grazing lands, to identify amenable areas before these practices can be considered ready for large scale implementation. The additional ruminant GHG emissions associated with higher forage output are likely to substantially reduce the mitigation potential of these practices, but could contribute to more GHG-efficient livestock production.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace65660
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace656602024-08-27T10:35:52Z Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices Henderson, Benjamin B. Gerber, Pierre J. Hilinski, T.E. Falcucci, A. Ojima, D.S. Salvatore, M. Conant, Richard T. research soil grazing lands greenhouse gases This study provides estimates of the net GHG mitigation potential of a selected range of management practices in the world’s native and cultivated grazing lands. The Century and Daycent models are used to calculate the changes in soil carbon stocks, soil N2O emissions, and forage removals by ruminants associated with these practices. GLEAM is used in combination with these models to establish grazing area boundaries and to parameterize links between forage consumption, animal production and animal GHG emissions. This study provides an alternative to the usual approach of extrapolating from a small number of field studies and by modeling the linkage between soil, forage and animals it sheds new light on the net mitigation potential of C sequestration practices in the world’s grazing lands. Three different mitigation practices are assessed in this study, namely, improved grazing management, legume sowing and N fertilization. We estimate that optimization of grazing pressure could sequester 148 Tg CO2 yr−1. The soil C sequestration potential of 203 Tg CO2 yr−1 for legume sowing was higher than for improved grazing management, despite being applied over a much smaller total area. However, N2O emissions from legumes were estimated to offset 28% of its global C sequestration benefits, in CO2 equivalent terms. Conversely, N2O emissions from N fertilization exceeded soil C sequestration, in all regions. Our estimated potential for increasing C stocks though in grazing lands is lower than earlier worldwide estimates (Smith et al., 2007 and Lal, 2004), mainly due to the much smaller grazing land area over which we estimate mitigation practices to be effective. A big concern is the high risk of the practices, particularly legumes, increasing soil-based GHGs if applied outside of this relatively small effective area. More work is needed to develop indicators, based on biophysical and management characteristics of grazing lands, to identify amenable areas before these practices can be considered ready for large scale implementation. The additional ruminant GHG emissions associated with higher forage output are likely to substantially reduce the mitigation potential of these practices, but could contribute to more GHG-efficient livestock production. 2015-09 2015-05-05T16:48:41Z 2015-05-05T16:48:41Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/65660 en Limited Access Elsevier Henderson, B.B., Gerber, P.J., Hilinski, T.E., Falcucci, A., Ojima, D.S., Salvatore, M. and Conant, R.T. 2015. Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 207: 91 - 100
spellingShingle research
soil
grazing lands
greenhouse gases
Henderson, Benjamin B.
Gerber, Pierre J.
Hilinski, T.E.
Falcucci, A.
Ojima, D.S.
Salvatore, M.
Conant, Richard T.
Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices
title Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices
title_full Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices
title_fullStr Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices
title_full_unstemmed Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices
title_short Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices
title_sort greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world s grazing lands modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices
topic research
soil
grazing lands
greenhouse gases
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/65660
work_keys_str_mv AT hendersonbenjaminb greenhousegasmitigationpotentialoftheworldsgrazinglandsmodelingsoilcarbonandnitrogenfluxesofmitigationpractices
AT gerberpierrej greenhousegasmitigationpotentialoftheworldsgrazinglandsmodelingsoilcarbonandnitrogenfluxesofmitigationpractices
AT hilinskite greenhousegasmitigationpotentialoftheworldsgrazinglandsmodelingsoilcarbonandnitrogenfluxesofmitigationpractices
AT falcuccia greenhousegasmitigationpotentialoftheworldsgrazinglandsmodelingsoilcarbonandnitrogenfluxesofmitigationpractices
AT ojimads greenhousegasmitigationpotentialoftheworldsgrazinglandsmodelingsoilcarbonandnitrogenfluxesofmitigationpractices
AT salvatorem greenhousegasmitigationpotentialoftheworldsgrazinglandsmodelingsoilcarbonandnitrogenfluxesofmitigationpractices
AT conantrichardt greenhousegasmitigationpotentialoftheworldsgrazinglandsmodelingsoilcarbonandnitrogenfluxesofmitigationpractices