Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation?

Based on a case study in Ethiopia, this paper shows that while farmers understand the social nature of community-managed irrigation, they share a narrow understanding of pump irrigation with policymakers as being primarily ‘technical’. They perceive pumps as liberating them from the ‘social’ limitat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dessalegn, Mengistu, Merrey, Douglas J.
Formato: Informe técnico
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Water Management Institute 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/65358
_version_ 1855513179168178176
author Dessalegn, Mengistu
Merrey, Douglas J.
author_browse Dessalegn, Mengistu
Merrey, Douglas J.
author_facet Dessalegn, Mengistu
Merrey, Douglas J.
author_sort Dessalegn, Mengistu
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Based on a case study in Ethiopia, this paper shows that while farmers understand the social nature of community-managed irrigation, they share a narrow understanding of pump irrigation with policymakers as being primarily ‘technical’. They perceive pumps as liberating them from the ‘social’ limitations of traditional communal irrigation. However, the rapid expansion of pump irrigation is leading to increasing competition and conflict over limited water resources. We analyze the wider implications for Africa of this lack of visibility of the social dimension of pump irrigation, and offer suggestions for future policy and applied research to address the problem before it becomes a widespread crisis.
format Informe técnico
id CGSpace65358
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher International Water Management Institute
publisherStr International Water Management Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace653582025-11-07T08:52:29Z Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation? Dessalegn, Mengistu Merrey, Douglas J. social aspects cooperation traditional farming small scale farming irrigation schemes irrigation methods agriculture technology pumps rural areas poverty productivity groundwater water resources farmers rivers case studies Based on a case study in Ethiopia, this paper shows that while farmers understand the social nature of community-managed irrigation, they share a narrow understanding of pump irrigation with policymakers as being primarily ‘technical’. They perceive pumps as liberating them from the ‘social’ limitations of traditional communal irrigation. However, the rapid expansion of pump irrigation is leading to increasing competition and conflict over limited water resources. We analyze the wider implications for Africa of this lack of visibility of the social dimension of pump irrigation, and offer suggestions for future policy and applied research to address the problem before it becomes a widespread crisis. 2014 2015-04-30T13:44:10Z 2015-04-30T13:44:10Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/65358 en Open Access application/pdf International Water Management Institute Dessalegn, Mengistu [IWMI]; Merrey, D. J.; 2014. Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation?. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 37p. (IWMI Research Report 161) 10.5337/2015.201
spellingShingle social aspects
cooperation
traditional farming
small scale farming
irrigation schemes
irrigation methods
agriculture
technology
pumps
rural areas
poverty
productivity
groundwater
water resources
farmers
rivers
case studies
Dessalegn, Mengistu
Merrey, Douglas J.
Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation?
title Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation?
title_full Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation?
title_fullStr Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation?
title_full_unstemmed Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation?
title_short Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation?
title_sort is social cooperation for traditional irrigation while technology is for motor pump irrigation
topic social aspects
cooperation
traditional farming
small scale farming
irrigation schemes
irrigation methods
agriculture
technology
pumps
rural areas
poverty
productivity
groundwater
water resources
farmers
rivers
case studies
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/65358
work_keys_str_mv AT dessalegnmengistu issocialcooperationfortraditionalirrigationwhiletechnologyisformotorpumpirrigation
AT merreydouglasj issocialcooperationfortraditionalirrigationwhiletechnologyisformotorpumpirrigation