Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems

We quantify the total water use (TWU) and consumptive water use index (CWUI) in grow-out culture of Penaeus monodon at different water and feeding management protocols using the water balance equation. Under two different water management protocols, treatment-wise TWU, was 2.09 and 2.43 ha-m 122 d-1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohanty, R.K., Mishra, Atmaram, Patil, D.U.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Central Fisheries Research Institute (SUMAE) 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/58435
_version_ 1855534670554333184
author Mohanty, R.K.
Mishra, Atmaram
Patil, D.U.
author_browse Mishra, Atmaram
Mohanty, R.K.
Patil, D.U.
author_facet Mohanty, R.K.
Mishra, Atmaram
Patil, D.U.
author_sort Mohanty, R.K.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description We quantify the total water use (TWU) and consumptive water use index (CWUI) in grow-out culture of Penaeus monodon at different water and feeding management protocols using the water balance equation. Under two different water management protocols, treatment-wise TWU, was 2.09 and 2.43 ha-m 122 d-1 in T1 (no water exchange) and T2 (water exchange on ‘requirement’ basis depending on water quality), respectively. The computed CWUI (m3 kg-1 biomass), was 5.35 and 6.02 in T1 and T2, respectively. Lower rates of water exchange (T2) showed significantly improved water quality, crop performance and productivity over the zero water exchange protocol. Similarly, under three different feed management protocols, treatment-wise estimated TWU was 2.52, 2.44 and 2.41 ha-m 119d-1, while the computed CWUI was 7.28, 6.88 and 6.34 in T1 (Regular feeding, 4-times a day), T2 (2-weeks feeding followed by 1-week no feed) and T3 (4-weeks feeding followed by 1-week no feed), respectively. Higher the feed input, higher was the TWU and CWUI. It was also recorded that longer the refeeding period, higher was the growth performance and yield as in the case of T3. This feeding practice also helped in lowering the feed input (7.5% in T2 and 5.5% in T3), thus minimizes the input cost and improve production efficiency.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace58435
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Central Fisheries Research Institute (SUMAE)
publisherStr Central Fisheries Research Institute (SUMAE)
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace584352025-06-17T08:24:03Z Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems Mohanty, R.K. Mishra, Atmaram Patil, D.U. aquaculture penaeus monodon shrimp culture feeds water budget water use water quality water management protocols ponds sediment We quantify the total water use (TWU) and consumptive water use index (CWUI) in grow-out culture of Penaeus monodon at different water and feeding management protocols using the water balance equation. Under two different water management protocols, treatment-wise TWU, was 2.09 and 2.43 ha-m 122 d-1 in T1 (no water exchange) and T2 (water exchange on ‘requirement’ basis depending on water quality), respectively. The computed CWUI (m3 kg-1 biomass), was 5.35 and 6.02 in T1 and T2, respectively. Lower rates of water exchange (T2) showed significantly improved water quality, crop performance and productivity over the zero water exchange protocol. Similarly, under three different feed management protocols, treatment-wise estimated TWU was 2.52, 2.44 and 2.41 ha-m 119d-1, while the computed CWUI was 7.28, 6.88 and 6.34 in T1 (Regular feeding, 4-times a day), T2 (2-weeks feeding followed by 1-week no feed) and T3 (4-weeks feeding followed by 1-week no feed), respectively. Higher the feed input, higher was the TWU and CWUI. It was also recorded that longer the refeeding period, higher was the growth performance and yield as in the case of T3. This feeding practice also helped in lowering the feed input (7.5% in T2 and 5.5% in T3), thus minimizes the input cost and improve production efficiency. 2014 2015-03-17T14:39:58Z 2015-03-17T14:39:58Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/58435 en Open Access Central Fisheries Research Institute (SUMAE) Mohanty, R. K.; Mishra, Atmaram; Patil, D. U. 2014. Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14:487-496. doi: https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v14_2_20
spellingShingle aquaculture
penaeus monodon
shrimp culture
feeds
water budget
water use
water quality
water management
protocols
ponds
sediment
Mohanty, R.K.
Mishra, Atmaram
Patil, D.U.
Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems
title Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems
title_full Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems
title_fullStr Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems
title_full_unstemmed Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems
title_short Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems
title_sort water budgeting in black tiger shrimp penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems
topic aquaculture
penaeus monodon
shrimp culture
feeds
water budget
water use
water quality
water management
protocols
ponds
sediment
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/58435
work_keys_str_mv AT mohantyrk waterbudgetinginblacktigershrimppenaeusmonodoncultureusingdifferentwaterandfeedmanagementsystems
AT mishraatmaram waterbudgetinginblacktigershrimppenaeusmonodoncultureusingdifferentwaterandfeedmanagementsystems
AT patildu waterbudgetinginblacktigershrimppenaeusmonodoncultureusingdifferentwaterandfeedmanagementsystems