A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change: in search of transparency, coherence and comparability
Because vulnerability is a conceptual construct rather than a directly observable phenomenon, most vulnerability assessments measure a set of “vulnerability indicators”. In order to identify the core approaches and range of variation in the field, we conducted a systematic literature review on lo...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo preliminar |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/56692 |
Ejemplares similares: A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change: in search of transparency, coherence and comparability
- A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change in developing country agriculture
- Systematic Review of Methods in Low-Consensus Fields: Supporting Commensuration through `Construct-Centered Methods Aggregation’ in the Case of Climate Change Vulnerability Research
- Climate-smart land use requires local solutions, transdisciplinary research, policy coherence and transparency
- Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
- Strengthening the food systems governance evidence base: Supporting commensurability of research through a systematic review of methods
- Strengthening Africa’s climate resilient outcomes: Policy coherence in climate-smart agriculture