Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe

Producing projections of future crop yields requires careful thought about the appropriate use of atmosphere-ocean global climate model (AOGCM) simulations. Here we describe and demonstrate multiple methods for ‘calibrating’ climate projections using an ensemble of AOGCM simulations in a ‘perfect si...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hawkins, E., Osborne, Tom M., Ho CK, Challinor, Andrew J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Elsevier 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52088
_version_ 1855521954896805888
author Hawkins, E.
Osborne, Tom M.
Ho CK
Challinor, Andrew J.
author_browse Challinor, Andrew J.
Hawkins, E.
Ho CK
Osborne, Tom M.
author_facet Hawkins, E.
Osborne, Tom M.
Ho CK
Challinor, Andrew J.
author_sort Hawkins, E.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Producing projections of future crop yields requires careful thought about the appropriate use of atmosphere-ocean global climate model (AOGCM) simulations. Here we describe and demonstrate multiple methods for ‘calibrating’ climate projections using an ensemble of AOGCM simulations in a ‘perfect sibling’ framework. Crucially, this type of analysis assesses the ability of each calibration methodology to produce reliable estimates of future climate, which is not possible just using historical observations. This type of approach could be more widely adopted for assessing calibration methodologies for crop modelling. The calibration methods assessed include the commonly used ‘delta’ (change factor) and ‘nudging’ (bias correction) approaches. We focus on daily maximum temperature in summer over Europe for this idealised case study, but the methods can be generalised to other variables and other regions. The calibration methods, which are relatively easy to implement given appropriate observations, produce more robust projections of future daily maximum temperatures and heat stress than using raw model output. The choice over which calibration method to use will likely depend on the situation, but change factor approaches tend to perform best in our examples. Finally, we demonstrate that the uncertainty due to the choice of calibration methodology is a significant contributor to the total uncertainty in future climate projections for impact studies. We conclude that utilising a variety of calibration methods on output from a wide range of AOGCMs is essential to produce climate data that will ensure robust and reliable crop yield projections.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace52088
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace520882024-08-27T10:35:34Z Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe Hawkins, E. Osborne, Tom M. Ho CK Challinor, Andrew J. climate agriculture crop yield crop modelling crop forecasting Producing projections of future crop yields requires careful thought about the appropriate use of atmosphere-ocean global climate model (AOGCM) simulations. Here we describe and demonstrate multiple methods for ‘calibrating’ climate projections using an ensemble of AOGCM simulations in a ‘perfect sibling’ framework. Crucially, this type of analysis assesses the ability of each calibration methodology to produce reliable estimates of future climate, which is not possible just using historical observations. This type of approach could be more widely adopted for assessing calibration methodologies for crop modelling. The calibration methods assessed include the commonly used ‘delta’ (change factor) and ‘nudging’ (bias correction) approaches. We focus on daily maximum temperature in summer over Europe for this idealised case study, but the methods can be generalised to other variables and other regions. The calibration methods, which are relatively easy to implement given appropriate observations, produce more robust projections of future daily maximum temperatures and heat stress than using raw model output. The choice over which calibration method to use will likely depend on the situation, but change factor approaches tend to perform best in our examples. Finally, we demonstrate that the uncertainty due to the choice of calibration methodology is a significant contributor to the total uncertainty in future climate projections for impact studies. We conclude that utilising a variety of calibration methods on output from a wide range of AOGCMs is essential to produce climate data that will ensure robust and reliable crop yield projections. 2013-03 2014-12-16T06:37:31Z 2014-12-16T06:37:31Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52088 en Limited Access Elsevier Hawkins E, Osborne TM, Ho CK, Challinor AJ. 2013. Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 170:19-31.
spellingShingle climate
agriculture
crop yield
crop modelling
crop forecasting
Hawkins, E.
Osborne, Tom M.
Ho CK
Challinor, Andrew J.
Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe
title Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe
title_full Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe
title_fullStr Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe
title_full_unstemmed Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe
title_short Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: An idealised case study over Europe
title_sort calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling an idealised case study over europe
topic climate
agriculture
crop yield
crop modelling
crop forecasting
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52088
work_keys_str_mv AT hawkinse calibrationandbiascorrectionofclimateprojectionsforcropmodellinganidealisedcasestudyovereurope
AT osbornetomm calibrationandbiascorrectionofclimateprojectionsforcropmodellinganidealisedcasestudyovereurope
AT hock calibrationandbiascorrectionofclimateprojectionsforcropmodellinganidealisedcasestudyovereurope
AT challinorandrewj calibrationandbiascorrectionofclimateprojectionsforcropmodellinganidealisedcasestudyovereurope