Evolution of resource use and property rights under risk: Issues

Since September 1993, ILCA and IFPRI have been engaged in a discussion about the most important, researchable, issues in the area of property rights. A concept note has been developed for collaborative research on the evolution of resource use and property institutions under risk. The starting poin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Swallow, B.M.
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Livestock Centre for Africa 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/4442
_version_ 1855522349469663232
author Swallow, B.M.
author_browse Swallow, B.M.
author_facet Swallow, B.M.
author_sort Swallow, B.M.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Since September 1993, ILCA and IFPRI have been engaged in a discussion about the most important, researchable, issues in the area of property rights. A concept note has been developed for collaborative research on the evolution of resource use and property institutions under risk. The starting point or framework was the Boserup, McIntire (and others) model of gradual intensification. This model has been used in documents such as the Winrock Assessment of Animal Agriculture to predict paths of future development and recommend research to facilitate that development. Basically, property rights systems follow the Demsetz model which says that population growth alters factor prices, driving up the value of land and giving rise to demand for individualization of property rights The model implies that the main role of research organizations is to develop land-saving technologies. However, the model ignores three important issues: (1) property rights systems have important risk management implications; (2) property rights systems have implications for the distribution of income and opportunity; and (3) property rights systems also entail different transactions costs. The path of intensification and agricultural development becomes ambiguous once these issues are considered. At least three alternative paths are possible. One, development may proceed along a path of gradual intensification. Two, the risk management and equity aspects of common property may block the process of intensification. Three, intensification may occur in a way that is socially Undesirable. It is important, therefore, to undertake research so that we can better understand the relationships between population growth, commercialization, risk, equity and transaction costs. The paper discusses these three omitted issues and listed researchable questions which arise from this discussion.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace4442
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1994
publishDateRange 1994
publishDateSort 1994
publisher International Livestock Centre for Africa
publisherStr International Livestock Centre for Africa
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace44422021-02-24T07:27:25Z Evolution of resource use and property rights under risk: Issues Swallow, B.M. resource management ownership right of access evolution risk economic distribution research Since September 1993, ILCA and IFPRI have been engaged in a discussion about the most important, researchable, issues in the area of property rights. A concept note has been developed for collaborative research on the evolution of resource use and property institutions under risk. The starting point or framework was the Boserup, McIntire (and others) model of gradual intensification. This model has been used in documents such as the Winrock Assessment of Animal Agriculture to predict paths of future development and recommend research to facilitate that development. Basically, property rights systems follow the Demsetz model which says that population growth alters factor prices, driving up the value of land and giving rise to demand for individualization of property rights The model implies that the main role of research organizations is to develop land-saving technologies. However, the model ignores three important issues: (1) property rights systems have important risk management implications; (2) property rights systems have implications for the distribution of income and opportunity; and (3) property rights systems also entail different transactions costs. The path of intensification and agricultural development becomes ambiguous once these issues are considered. At least three alternative paths are possible. One, development may proceed along a path of gradual intensification. Two, the risk management and equity aspects of common property may block the process of intensification. Three, intensification may occur in a way that is socially Undesirable. It is important, therefore, to undertake research so that we can better understand the relationships between population growth, commercialization, risk, equity and transaction costs. The paper discusses these three omitted issues and listed researchable questions which arise from this discussion. 1994 2011-07-19T06:28:00Z 2011-07-19T06:28:00Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/4442 en Open Access International Livestock Centre for Africa
spellingShingle resource management
ownership
right of access
evolution
risk
economic distribution
research
Swallow, B.M.
Evolution of resource use and property rights under risk: Issues
title Evolution of resource use and property rights under risk: Issues
title_full Evolution of resource use and property rights under risk: Issues
title_fullStr Evolution of resource use and property rights under risk: Issues
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of resource use and property rights under risk: Issues
title_short Evolution of resource use and property rights under risk: Issues
title_sort evolution of resource use and property rights under risk issues
topic resource management
ownership
right of access
evolution
risk
economic distribution
research
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/4442
work_keys_str_mv AT swallowbm evolutionofresourceuseandpropertyrightsunderriskissues