Socio-ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop-residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central Kenya

Soil fertility gradients develop on smallholder farms due to preferential allocation of inputs. A multi-location on-farm trial was conducted in Meru South, Central Kenya whose overall aim was to test minimum tillage and crop-residue retention practices in socio-ecological niches across heterogeneo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guto, SN, Pypers, Pieter, Vanlauwe, Bernard, Ridder, N.A. de, Giller, Kenneth E.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/44106
_version_ 1855531510769123328
author Guto, SN
Pypers, Pieter
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Ridder, N.A. de
Giller, Kenneth E.
author_browse Giller, Kenneth E.
Guto, SN
Pypers, Pieter
Ridder, N.A. de
Vanlauwe, Bernard
author_facet Guto, SN
Pypers, Pieter
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Ridder, N.A. de
Giller, Kenneth E.
author_sort Guto, SN
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Soil fertility gradients develop on smallholder farms due to preferential allocation of inputs. A multi-location on-farm trial was conducted in Meru South, Central Kenya whose overall aim was to test minimum tillage and crop-residue retention practices in socio-ecological niches across heterogeneous smallholder farms. We identified three soil fertility classes together with the farmers, namely: good, medium, and poor. In each soil fertility class, two tillage (minimum or regular) and two crop residue (removed or retained) practices were tested for four consecutive seasons. Maize (Zea mays L.) grain yields in the good fields were above 2.5 Mg ha?1 across cropping seasons and cumulated yields were not influenced by tillage or crop residue management. The grain yields in the medium fields ranged between 1.3 and 5.4 Mg ha?1 and were greater with crop residue retention. In the poor fields, grain yield was <3.6 Mg ha?1 and minimum tillage resulted in yield decrease while crop residue addition did not affect yields. Regular tillage and crop residue removal resulted in largest gross benefits in the good fields ($5376 ha?1) while in the medium fields, minimum tillage with residue retention was most profitable ($3214 ha?1). Retention of crop residues will give improved maize performance in the medium fields and the prevailing prices favor minimum tillage and crop residue retention. In the poor fields, the emphasis should be on the rehabilitation of soil physical and chemical attributes because none of the tillage and crop residue practices was profitable.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace44106
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace441062024-08-27T10:36:29Z Socio-ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop-residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central Kenya Guto, SN Pypers, Pieter Vanlauwe, Bernard Ridder, N.A. de Giller, Kenneth E. tillage cropping systems smallholder agriculture maize aradura sistemas de cultivo Soil fertility gradients develop on smallholder farms due to preferential allocation of inputs. A multi-location on-farm trial was conducted in Meru South, Central Kenya whose overall aim was to test minimum tillage and crop-residue retention practices in socio-ecological niches across heterogeneous smallholder farms. We identified three soil fertility classes together with the farmers, namely: good, medium, and poor. In each soil fertility class, two tillage (minimum or regular) and two crop residue (removed or retained) practices were tested for four consecutive seasons. Maize (Zea mays L.) grain yields in the good fields were above 2.5 Mg ha?1 across cropping seasons and cumulated yields were not influenced by tillage or crop residue management. The grain yields in the medium fields ranged between 1.3 and 5.4 Mg ha?1 and were greater with crop residue retention. In the poor fields, grain yield was <3.6 Mg ha?1 and minimum tillage resulted in yield decrease while crop residue addition did not affect yields. Regular tillage and crop residue removal resulted in largest gross benefits in the good fields ($5376 ha?1) while in the medium fields, minimum tillage with residue retention was most profitable ($3214 ha?1). Retention of crop residues will give improved maize performance in the medium fields and the prevailing prices favor minimum tillage and crop residue retention. In the poor fields, the emphasis should be on the rehabilitation of soil physical and chemical attributes because none of the tillage and crop residue practices was profitable. 2012-01 2014-10-02T08:33:15Z 2014-10-02T08:33:15Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/44106 en Open Access Wiley
spellingShingle tillage
cropping systems
smallholder agriculture
maize
aradura
sistemas de cultivo
Guto, SN
Pypers, Pieter
Vanlauwe, Bernard
Ridder, N.A. de
Giller, Kenneth E.
Socio-ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop-residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central Kenya
title Socio-ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop-residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central Kenya
title_full Socio-ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop-residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central Kenya
title_fullStr Socio-ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop-residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Socio-ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop-residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central Kenya
title_short Socio-ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop-residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central Kenya
title_sort socio ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central kenya
topic tillage
cropping systems
smallholder agriculture
maize
aradura
sistemas de cultivo
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/44106
work_keys_str_mv AT gutosn socioecologicalnichesforminimumtillageandcropresidueretentionincontinuousmaizecroppingsystemsinsmallholderfarmsofcentralkenya
AT pyperspieter socioecologicalnichesforminimumtillageandcropresidueretentionincontinuousmaizecroppingsystemsinsmallholderfarmsofcentralkenya
AT vanlauwebernard socioecologicalnichesforminimumtillageandcropresidueretentionincontinuousmaizecroppingsystemsinsmallholderfarmsofcentralkenya
AT riddernade socioecologicalnichesforminimumtillageandcropresidueretentionincontinuousmaizecroppingsystemsinsmallholderfarmsofcentralkenya
AT gillerkennethe socioecologicalnichesforminimumtillageandcropresidueretentionincontinuousmaizecroppingsystemsinsmallholderfarmsofcentralkenya