An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data

The Digital Elevation Model that has been derived from the February 2000 Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) has been one of the most important publicly available new spatial data sets in recent years. However, the ‘finished’ grade version of the data (also referred to as Version 2) still contai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reuter, HI, Nelson, A., Jarvis, Andy
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43175
_version_ 1855534321854578688
author Reuter, HI
Nelson, A.
Jarvis, Andy
author_browse Jarvis, Andy
Nelson, A.
Reuter, HI
author_facet Reuter, HI
Nelson, A.
Jarvis, Andy
author_sort Reuter, HI
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The Digital Elevation Model that has been derived from the February 2000 Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) has been one of the most important publicly available new spatial data sets in recent years. However, the ‘finished’ grade version of the data (also referred to as Version 2) still contains data voids (some 836,000 km2)—and other anomalies—that prevent immediate use in many applications. These voids can be filled using a range of interpolation algorithms in conjunction with other sources of elevation data, but there is little guidance on the most appropriate void?filling method. This paper describes: (i) a method to fill voids using a variety of interpolators, (ii) a method to determine the most appropriate void?filling algorithms using a classification of the voids based on their size and a typology of their surrounding terrain; and (iii) the classification of the most appropriate algorithm for each of the 3,339,913 voids in the SRTM data. Based on a sample of 1304 artificial but realistic voids across six terrain types and eight void size classes, we found that the choice of void?filling algorithm is dependent on both the size and terrain type of the void. Contrary to some previous findings, the best methods can be generalised as: kriging or inverse distance weighting interpolation for small and medium size voids in relatively flat low?lying areas; spline interpolation for small and medium?sized voids in high?altitude and dissected terrain; triangular irregular network or inverse distance weighting interpolation for large voids in very flat areas, and an advanced spline method (ANUDEM) for large voids in other terrains.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace43175
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2007
publishDateRange 2007
publishDateSort 2007
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace431752016-02-23T18:22:31Z An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data Reuter, HI Nelson, A. Jarvis, Andy spatial information topography methods digital image processing información espacial topografía métodos procesamiento digital de imágenes The Digital Elevation Model that has been derived from the February 2000 Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) has been one of the most important publicly available new spatial data sets in recent years. However, the ‘finished’ grade version of the data (also referred to as Version 2) still contains data voids (some 836,000 km2)—and other anomalies—that prevent immediate use in many applications. These voids can be filled using a range of interpolation algorithms in conjunction with other sources of elevation data, but there is little guidance on the most appropriate void?filling method. This paper describes: (i) a method to fill voids using a variety of interpolators, (ii) a method to determine the most appropriate void?filling algorithms using a classification of the voids based on their size and a typology of their surrounding terrain; and (iii) the classification of the most appropriate algorithm for each of the 3,339,913 voids in the SRTM data. Based on a sample of 1304 artificial but realistic voids across six terrain types and eight void size classes, we found that the choice of void?filling algorithm is dependent on both the size and terrain type of the void. Contrary to some previous findings, the best methods can be generalised as: kriging or inverse distance weighting interpolation for small and medium size voids in relatively flat low?lying areas; spline interpolation for small and medium?sized voids in high?altitude and dissected terrain; triangular irregular network or inverse distance weighting interpolation for large voids in very flat areas, and an advanced spline method (ANUDEM) for large voids in other terrains. 2007 2014-09-24T08:41:44Z 2014-09-24T08:41:44Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43175 en Open Access
spellingShingle spatial information
topography
methods
digital image processing
información espacial
topografía
métodos
procesamiento digital de imágenes
Reuter, HI
Nelson, A.
Jarvis, Andy
An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data
title An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data
title_full An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data
title_fullStr An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data
title_short An evaluation of void-filling interpolation methods for SRTM data
title_sort evaluation of void filling interpolation methods for srtm data
topic spatial information
topography
methods
digital image processing
información espacial
topografía
métodos
procesamiento digital de imágenes
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43175
work_keys_str_mv AT reuterhi anevaluationofvoidfillinginterpolationmethodsforsrtmdata
AT nelsona anevaluationofvoidfillinginterpolationmethodsforsrtmdata
AT jarvisandy anevaluationofvoidfillinginterpolationmethodsforsrtmdata
AT reuterhi evaluationofvoidfillinginterpolationmethodsforsrtmdata
AT nelsona evaluationofvoidfillinginterpolationmethodsforsrtmdata
AT jarvisandy evaluationofvoidfillinginterpolationmethodsforsrtmdata