Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation agriculture: Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014) ‘A fourth principle is required to define conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: The appropriate use of fertilizer to enhance crop productivity’
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/42309 |
Similar Items: Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation agriculture: Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014) ‘A fourth principle is required to define conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: The appropriate use of fertilizer to enhance crop productivity’
- A fourth principle is required to define conservation agriculture in subSaharan Africa: the appropriate use of fertilizer to enhance crop productivity
- Response to Sommer et al. (2014) Fertiliser use is not required as a fourth principle to define conservation agriculture
- Principles of integrated soil fertility management
- The principles of conservation and development: do they apply in Malinau?
- Commentary on Defining the Problem
- Environmental services and the precautionary principle: using scenarios to reconcile conservation and livelihood objectives in upper catchments