Review of the CPWF small grants initiative
This working paper reviews the experiences of the Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) with 14 “small grants for impact” that were contracted in early 2006 and operated for periods of 12 to 18 months. For a total investment of under US$1 million – less than the equivalent of a typical 3-5 ye...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo preliminar |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/4198 |
| _version_ | 1855527542683860992 |
|---|---|
| author | Woolley, Jonathan N. |
| author_browse | Woolley, Jonathan N. |
| author_facet | Woolley, Jonathan N. |
| author_sort | Woolley, Jonathan N. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | This working paper reviews the experiences of the Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) with 14 “small
grants for impact” that were contracted in early 2006 and operated for periods of 12 to 18 months. For a total
investment of under US$1 million – less than the equivalent of a typical 3-5 year CPWF research for development
project in Phase 1, the small grant projects made significant contributions to identifying water and food technology
for specific end users (thus showing the potential of CPWF research in general); to better understanding of
adoption; to stimulating research by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and to better connecting CPWF
researchers in general to the reality of the development process. Four of the small grants were outstanding in their
contribution across all four of these criteria; six others made significant contributions to one or more, representing a
high success rate for the original investment. The quality of many of the 126 eligible proposals received was sufficient
to have identified at least 20 more projects suitable for immediate funding at that time in late 2005. Unfortunately,
other demands on CPWF funding and priorities on research set by the Consortium Steering Committee made
it impossible to support these. This review concludes that calls for small grant proposals are an effective way of
obtaining local impact and of connecting a wide range of relevant institutions to the efforts of a network such as
CPWF |
| format | Artículo preliminar |
| id | CGSpace4198 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateRange | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food |
| publisherStr | CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace41982025-11-12T07:32:48Z Review of the CPWF small grants initiative Woolley, Jonathan N. gender This working paper reviews the experiences of the Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) with 14 “small grants for impact” that were contracted in early 2006 and operated for periods of 12 to 18 months. For a total investment of under US$1 million – less than the equivalent of a typical 3-5 year CPWF research for development project in Phase 1, the small grant projects made significant contributions to identifying water and food technology for specific end users (thus showing the potential of CPWF research in general); to better understanding of adoption; to stimulating research by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and to better connecting CPWF researchers in general to the reality of the development process. Four of the small grants were outstanding in their contribution across all four of these criteria; six others made significant contributions to one or more, representing a high success rate for the original investment. The quality of many of the 126 eligible proposals received was sufficient to have identified at least 20 more projects suitable for immediate funding at that time in late 2005. Unfortunately, other demands on CPWF funding and priorities on research set by the Consortium Steering Committee made it impossible to support these. This review concludes that calls for small grant proposals are an effective way of obtaining local impact and of connecting a wide range of relevant institutions to the efforts of a network such as CPWF 2011 2011-07-18T16:37:21Z 2011-07-18T16:37:21Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/4198 en Open Access application/pdf CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food Woolley, J. 2011. Strengthening CPWF project evaluations. Review of the CPWF small grants initiative. CPWF Impact Assessment Working Paper 9. Colombo, Sri Lanka: CGIAR Challenge Program for Water and Food. |
| spellingShingle | gender Woolley, Jonathan N. Review of the CPWF small grants initiative |
| title | Review of the CPWF small grants initiative |
| title_full | Review of the CPWF small grants initiative |
| title_fullStr | Review of the CPWF small grants initiative |
| title_full_unstemmed | Review of the CPWF small grants initiative |
| title_short | Review of the CPWF small grants initiative |
| title_sort | review of the cpwf small grants initiative |
| topic | gender |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/4198 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT woolleyjonathann reviewofthecpwfsmallgrantsinitiative |