Relevance and limitations of biogenic and physicogenic classification: a comparison of approaches for differentiating the origin of soil aggregates
Although freshly formed or unaltered biogenic aggregates are easily recognized, identifying the origin of aggregates altered by physical and biological processes remains empirical and prone to error. The aim of this study was to distinguish between biogenic (BIO) and physicogenic (PHYS) aggregates i...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/40616 |
Ejemplares similares: Relevance and limitations of biogenic and physicogenic classification: a comparison of approaches for differentiating the origin of soil aggregates
- How do earthworms influence organic matter quantity and quality in tropical soils?
- Stability of soil aggregates in Arys Turkestan Canal Command Zone
- Do earthworms and roots cooperate to build soil macroaggregates? A microcosm experiment
- Interactive effects of plants and earthworms on the physical stabilization of soil organic matter in aggregates
- Digging in: impact of land use changes on soil aggregation patterns and carbon stocks in the moist tropics of the Mizoram in the Indomalayan realm
- Earthworms accelerate soil porosity turnover under watering conditions