How pro-poor are participatory watershed management projects?: an Indian case study

This report draws on a survey and case study evidence from 28 watershed management groups in Haryana to argue that participatory watershed management projects need not necessarily safeguard the interests of poorer rural households.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurian, Mathew, Dietz, T.
Formato: Informe técnico
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Water Management Institute 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/39879
_version_ 1855515383116595200
author Kurian, Mathew
Dietz, T.
author_browse Dietz, T.
Kurian, Mathew
author_facet Kurian, Mathew
Dietz, T.
author_sort Kurian, Mathew
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This report draws on a survey and case study evidence from 28 watershed management groups in Haryana to argue that participatory watershed management projects need not necessarily safeguard the interests of poorer rural households.
format Informe técnico
id CGSpace39879
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2005
publishDateRange 2005
publishDateSort 2005
publisher International Water Management Institute
publisherStr International Water Management Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace398792025-11-07T08:41:51Z How pro-poor are participatory watershed management projects?: an Indian case study Kurian, Mathew Dietz, T. watershed management participatory management poverty farm income labour households women forest management dams irrigated farming case studies This report draws on a survey and case study evidence from 28 watershed management groups in Haryana to argue that participatory watershed management projects need not necessarily safeguard the interests of poorer rural households. 2005 2014-06-13T14:29:36Z 2014-06-13T14:29:36Z Report https://hdl.handle.net/10568/39879 en Open Access application/pdf International Water Management Institute Kurian, Mathew; Dietz, T. 2005. How pro-poor are participatory watershed management projects?: an Indian case study. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). v, 25p. (IWMI Research Report 092)
spellingShingle watershed management
participatory management
poverty
farm income
labour
households
women
forest management
dams
irrigated farming
case studies
Kurian, Mathew
Dietz, T.
How pro-poor are participatory watershed management projects?: an Indian case study
title How pro-poor are participatory watershed management projects?: an Indian case study
title_full How pro-poor are participatory watershed management projects?: an Indian case study
title_fullStr How pro-poor are participatory watershed management projects?: an Indian case study
title_full_unstemmed How pro-poor are participatory watershed management projects?: an Indian case study
title_short How pro-poor are participatory watershed management projects?: an Indian case study
title_sort how pro poor are participatory watershed management projects an indian case study
topic watershed management
participatory management
poverty
farm income
labour
households
women
forest management
dams
irrigated farming
case studies
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/39879
work_keys_str_mv AT kurianmathew howpropoorareparticipatorywatershedmanagementprojectsanindiancasestudy
AT dietzt howpropoorareparticipatorywatershedmanagementprojectsanindiancasestudy