Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed
Because of their accuracy and precision for measuring gas concentrations, gas chromatographs (GC) are standard analytical instruments used in investigations of nitrous oxide (N2 O) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) exchange between the soil and the atmosphere. Iqbal et al. (2012) indicate that photoacoustic...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Wiley
2013
|
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/33975 |
| _version_ | 1855524159753289728 |
|---|---|
| author | Rosenstock, Todd S. Díaz Pinés, Eugenio Zuazo, Pablo Jordan, G. Predotova, M. Mutuo, P. Abwanda, Sheila O. Thiong'o, M. Buerkert, Andreas Rufino, Mariana C. Kiese, Ralf Neufeldt, Henry Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus |
| author_browse | Abwanda, Sheila O. Buerkert, Andreas Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus Díaz Pinés, Eugenio Jordan, G. Kiese, Ralf Mutuo, P. Neufeldt, Henry Predotova, M. Rosenstock, Todd S. Rufino, Mariana C. Thiong'o, M. Zuazo, Pablo |
| author_facet | Rosenstock, Todd S. Díaz Pinés, Eugenio Zuazo, Pablo Jordan, G. Predotova, M. Mutuo, P. Abwanda, Sheila O. Thiong'o, M. Buerkert, Andreas Rufino, Mariana C. Kiese, Ralf Neufeldt, Henry Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus |
| author_sort | Rosenstock, Todd S. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Because of their accuracy and precision for measuring gas concentrations, gas chromatographs (GC) are standard analytical instruments used in investigations of nitrous oxide (N2 O) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) exchange between the soil and the atmosphere. Iqbal et al. (2012) indicate that photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) performs similar to GCs for this purpose. We welcome this addition to the literature, given the increasing number of studies using PAS (e.g., Predotova et al. 2009; Leytem et al. 2011) and the few comparative analyses available (Ambus & Robertson 1998; Yamulki & Jarvis 1999). However, poor performance of PAS in some assessments (Akdeniz et al., 2009) and data from our own tests (reported below) raise questions about whether Iqbal et al.'s (2012) results are generally applicable to PAS instruments or unique to the experimental conditions and calibration of their instruments. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace33975 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateRange | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| publisherStr | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace339752024-01-17T12:58:34Z Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed Rosenstock, Todd S. Díaz Pinés, Eugenio Zuazo, Pablo Jordan, G. Predotova, M. Mutuo, P. Abwanda, Sheila O. Thiong'o, M. Buerkert, Andreas Rufino, Mariana C. Kiese, Ralf Neufeldt, Henry Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus Because of their accuracy and precision for measuring gas concentrations, gas chromatographs (GC) are standard analytical instruments used in investigations of nitrous oxide (N2 O) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) exchange between the soil and the atmosphere. Iqbal et al. (2012) indicate that photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) performs similar to GCs for this purpose. We welcome this addition to the literature, given the increasing number of studies using PAS (e.g., Predotova et al. 2009; Leytem et al. 2011) and the few comparative analyses available (Ambus & Robertson 1998; Yamulki & Jarvis 1999). However, poor performance of PAS in some assessments (Akdeniz et al., 2009) and data from our own tests (reported below) raise questions about whether Iqbal et al.'s (2012) results are generally applicable to PAS instruments or unique to the experimental conditions and calibration of their instruments. 2013-12 2013-11-08T09:51:06Z 2013-11-08T09:51:06Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/33975 en Open Access Wiley Rosenstock, T.S., Diaz-Pines, E., Zuazo, P., Jordan, G., Predotova, M., Mutuo, P., Abwanda, S., Thiong’o, M., Buerkert, A., Rufino, M., Kiese, R., Neufeldt, H. and Butterbach-Bahl, K. 2013. Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed. Global Change Biology 19(12): 3565-3567. |
| spellingShingle | Rosenstock, Todd S. Díaz Pinés, Eugenio Zuazo, Pablo Jordan, G. Predotova, M. Mutuo, P. Abwanda, Sheila O. Thiong'o, M. Buerkert, Andreas Rufino, Mariana C. Kiese, Ralf Neufeldt, Henry Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed |
| title | Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed |
| title_full | Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed |
| title_fullStr | Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed |
| title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed |
| title_short | Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed |
| title_sort | accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/33975 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenstocktodds accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT diazpineseugenio accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT zuazopablo accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT jordang accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT predotovam accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT mutuop accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT abwandasheilao accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT thiongom accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT buerkertandreas accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT rufinomarianac accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT kieseralf accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT neufeldthenry accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed AT butterbachbahlklaus accuracyandprecisionofphotoacousticspectroscopynotguaranteed |