Trade-offs between forage yields and feed quality of Lablab purpureus, and milk yields in relation to planting and harvesting schedules

This study, designed to investigate trade-offs between forage yields, feed quality and labour use in fitting a newly introduced crop, Lablab purpureus, into an existing farming system, adopted distinct applied and adaptive research approaches. The applied research component compared forage yields, n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agyemang, K., Okike, Iheanacho, Makun, H.J., Magaji, S.O.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/32911
_version_ 1855536283175092224
author Agyemang, K.
Okike, Iheanacho
Makun, H.J.
Magaji, S.O.
author_browse Agyemang, K.
Magaji, S.O.
Makun, H.J.
Okike, Iheanacho
author_facet Agyemang, K.
Okike, Iheanacho
Makun, H.J.
Magaji, S.O.
author_sort Agyemang, K.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This study, designed to investigate trade-offs between forage yields, feed quality and labour use in fitting a newly introduced crop, Lablab purpureus, into an existing farming system, adopted distinct applied and adaptive research approaches. The applied research component compared forage yields, nutrient contents and feeding qualities of L. purpureus harvested at 100, 114, 128 or 142 d after planting in an on-farm trial. The adaptive research investigated how farmers incorporated L. purpureus cultivation into their farming calendars given the constraints of labour for planting and harvesting. Harvested dry matter yields from the on-farm experiment were 1.28, 1.98, 1.74 and 1.44 t ha-1. The resultant hays were fed to four groups each of five Bunaji lactating cows in an on-farm feeding trial over a 10-week period. Ranking the various harvests for yield, the hays for feed value, animal responses to the feed consumed and the quality of animal products on a linear scale (1 to 4) to estimate a composite utility index, showed that harvesting at 114 d after planting gave the most desirable overall benefits. The survey for adaptive research showed bimodal rainfed and irrigated cultivation patterns for L. purpureus. Peaks were observed in September (31 percent of farmers) and November (24 percent) for planting, and in December (39.4 percent) and March (15 percent) for harvesting. Forage yields were, however, highest for the 3 percent of farmers who afforded labour to plant in July and harvest in October. The lack of congruence between highest forage yield periods and the peaks of cultivation of L. purpureus by farmers in the study area was mostly explained by very significant differences in the cost of hired and household labour in different months. Thus, socio-economic and cultural factors, including stakeholders; participation, need to be considered along with applied research results when recommending forage species for farmers' adoption.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace32911
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2000
publishDateRange 2000
publishDateSort 2000
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace329112024-11-15T08:52:58Z Trade-offs between forage yields and feed quality of Lablab purpureus, and milk yields in relation to planting and harvesting schedules Agyemang, K. Okike, Iheanacho Makun, H.J. Magaji, S.O. feed crops lablab purpureus herbage yield feed quality milk yield planting harvesting chemical composition degradation This study, designed to investigate trade-offs between forage yields, feed quality and labour use in fitting a newly introduced crop, Lablab purpureus, into an existing farming system, adopted distinct applied and adaptive research approaches. The applied research component compared forage yields, nutrient contents and feeding qualities of L. purpureus harvested at 100, 114, 128 or 142 d after planting in an on-farm trial. The adaptive research investigated how farmers incorporated L. purpureus cultivation into their farming calendars given the constraints of labour for planting and harvesting. Harvested dry matter yields from the on-farm experiment were 1.28, 1.98, 1.74 and 1.44 t ha-1. The resultant hays were fed to four groups each of five Bunaji lactating cows in an on-farm feeding trial over a 10-week period. Ranking the various harvests for yield, the hays for feed value, animal responses to the feed consumed and the quality of animal products on a linear scale (1 to 4) to estimate a composite utility index, showed that harvesting at 114 d after planting gave the most desirable overall benefits. The survey for adaptive research showed bimodal rainfed and irrigated cultivation patterns for L. purpureus. Peaks were observed in September (31 percent of farmers) and November (24 percent) for planting, and in December (39.4 percent) and March (15 percent) for harvesting. Forage yields were, however, highest for the 3 percent of farmers who afforded labour to plant in July and harvest in October. The lack of congruence between highest forage yield periods and the peaks of cultivation of L. purpureus by farmers in the study area was mostly explained by very significant differences in the cost of hired and household labour in different months. Thus, socio-economic and cultural factors, including stakeholders; participation, need to be considered along with applied research results when recommending forage species for farmers' adoption. 2000-10 2013-07-03T05:25:44Z 2013-07-03T05:25:44Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/32911 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Experimental Agriculture;36(4): 435-451
spellingShingle feed crops
lablab purpureus
herbage yield
feed quality
milk yield
planting
harvesting
chemical composition
degradation
Agyemang, K.
Okike, Iheanacho
Makun, H.J.
Magaji, S.O.
Trade-offs between forage yields and feed quality of Lablab purpureus, and milk yields in relation to planting and harvesting schedules
title Trade-offs between forage yields and feed quality of Lablab purpureus, and milk yields in relation to planting and harvesting schedules
title_full Trade-offs between forage yields and feed quality of Lablab purpureus, and milk yields in relation to planting and harvesting schedules
title_fullStr Trade-offs between forage yields and feed quality of Lablab purpureus, and milk yields in relation to planting and harvesting schedules
title_full_unstemmed Trade-offs between forage yields and feed quality of Lablab purpureus, and milk yields in relation to planting and harvesting schedules
title_short Trade-offs between forage yields and feed quality of Lablab purpureus, and milk yields in relation to planting and harvesting schedules
title_sort trade offs between forage yields and feed quality of lablab purpureus and milk yields in relation to planting and harvesting schedules
topic feed crops
lablab purpureus
herbage yield
feed quality
milk yield
planting
harvesting
chemical composition
degradation
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/32911
work_keys_str_mv AT agyemangk tradeoffsbetweenforageyieldsandfeedqualityoflablabpurpureusandmilkyieldsinrelationtoplantingandharvestingschedules
AT okikeiheanacho tradeoffsbetweenforageyieldsandfeedqualityoflablabpurpureusandmilkyieldsinrelationtoplantingandharvestingschedules
AT makunhj tradeoffsbetweenforageyieldsandfeedqualityoflablabpurpureusandmilkyieldsinrelationtoplantingandharvestingschedules
AT magajiso tradeoffsbetweenforageyieldsandfeedqualityoflablabpurpureusandmilkyieldsinrelationtoplantingandharvestingschedules