Do plot sizes affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models?
Species distribution models are used extensively in predicting the distribution of vegetation across a landscape. Accuracy of the species distribution maps produced by these models deserves attention, since low accuracy maps may lead to erroneous conservation decisions. While plot size is known to i...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Springer
2010
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/3183 |
| _version_ | 1855517595772387328 |
|---|---|
| author | Pandit, S. Hayward, A. Leeuw, Jan de Kolasa, J. |
| author_browse | Hayward, A. Kolasa, J. Leeuw, Jan de Pandit, S. |
| author_facet | Pandit, S. Hayward, A. Leeuw, Jan de Kolasa, J. |
| author_sort | Pandit, S. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Species distribution models are used extensively in predicting the distribution of vegetation across a landscape. Accuracy of the species distribution maps produced by these models deserves attention, since low accuracy maps may lead to erroneous conservation decisions. While plot size is known to influence measures of species richness, its effect on our ability to predict species distribution ranges has not been tested. Our aim is to test whether the accuracy of the distribution maps produced depend on the size of the plot (quadrat) used to collect biological data in the field. In this study, the presences of four plant species were recorded in five sizes of circular plots, with radii ranging from 8 to 100 m. Logistic regression-based models were used to predict the distributions of the four plant species based on empirical evidence of their relationship with eight environmental predictors: distance to river, slope, aspect, altitude, and four principle component axes derived using reflectance values from Aster images. We found that plot size affected the probability of recording the four species, with reductions in plot size generally increasing the frequency of recorded absences. Plot size also significantly affected the likelihood of correctly predicting the distribution of species whenever plot size was below the minimum size required to consistently record species’ presence. Furthermore, the optimal plot size for fitting species distribution models varied among species. Finally, plot size had little impact on overall accuracy, but a strong, positive impact on Kappa accuracy (which provides a stronger measure of model accuracy by accounting for the effects of chance agreements between predictions and observations). Our results suggest that optimal plot size must be considered explicitly in the creation of species distribution models if they are to be successfully adopted into conservation efforts. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace3183 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateRange | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Springer |
| publisherStr | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace31832023-12-08T19:36:04Z Do plot sizes affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models? Pandit, S. Hayward, A. Leeuw, Jan de Kolasa, J. Species distribution models are used extensively in predicting the distribution of vegetation across a landscape. Accuracy of the species distribution maps produced by these models deserves attention, since low accuracy maps may lead to erroneous conservation decisions. While plot size is known to influence measures of species richness, its effect on our ability to predict species distribution ranges has not been tested. Our aim is to test whether the accuracy of the distribution maps produced depend on the size of the plot (quadrat) used to collect biological data in the field. In this study, the presences of four plant species were recorded in five sizes of circular plots, with radii ranging from 8 to 100 m. Logistic regression-based models were used to predict the distributions of the four plant species based on empirical evidence of their relationship with eight environmental predictors: distance to river, slope, aspect, altitude, and four principle component axes derived using reflectance values from Aster images. We found that plot size affected the probability of recording the four species, with reductions in plot size generally increasing the frequency of recorded absences. Plot size also significantly affected the likelihood of correctly predicting the distribution of species whenever plot size was below the minimum size required to consistently record species’ presence. Furthermore, the optimal plot size for fitting species distribution models varied among species. Finally, plot size had little impact on overall accuracy, but a strong, positive impact on Kappa accuracy (which provides a stronger measure of model accuracy by accounting for the effects of chance agreements between predictions and observations). Our results suggest that optimal plot size must be considered explicitly in the creation of species distribution models if they are to be successfully adopted into conservation efforts. 2010-12 2011-02-14T09:30:26Z 2011-02-14T09:30:26Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/3183 en Limited Access Springer Pandit, S.N., Hayward, A., Leeuw, J. de and Kolasa, J. 2010. Does plot size affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models? Journal of Geographical Systems 12(4):389-407. |
| spellingShingle | Pandit, S. Hayward, A. Leeuw, Jan de Kolasa, J. Do plot sizes affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models? |
| title | Do plot sizes affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models? |
| title_full | Do plot sizes affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models? |
| title_fullStr | Do plot sizes affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do plot sizes affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models? |
| title_short | Do plot sizes affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models? |
| title_sort | do plot sizes affect the performance of gis based species distribution models |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/3183 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pandits doplotsizesaffecttheperformanceofgisbasedspeciesdistributionmodels AT haywarda doplotsizesaffecttheperformanceofgisbasedspeciesdistributionmodels AT leeuwjande doplotsizesaffecttheperformanceofgisbasedspeciesdistributionmodels AT kolasaj doplotsizesaffecttheperformanceofgisbasedspeciesdistributionmodels |