Livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern Ethiopia

Agricultural systems of Northern Ethiopia are under pressure from demographic expansion leading to land degradation and increasing water scarcity. Livestock water productivity (LWP) is an important component in improving overall productivity in mixed crop-livestock systems. The objective of the stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mekonnen, S., Descheemaeker, Katrien K., Tolera, Adugna, Amede, Tilahun
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Cambridge University Press 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/3054
_version_ 1855542504834727936
author Mekonnen, S.
Descheemaeker, Katrien K.
Tolera, Adugna
Amede, Tilahun
author_browse Amede, Tilahun
Descheemaeker, Katrien K.
Mekonnen, S.
Tolera, Adugna
author_facet Mekonnen, S.
Descheemaeker, Katrien K.
Tolera, Adugna
Amede, Tilahun
author_sort Mekonnen, S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Agricultural systems of Northern Ethiopia are under pressure from demographic expansion leading to land degradation and increasing water scarcity. Livestock water productivity (LWP) is an important component in improving overall productivity in mixed crop-livestock systems. The objective of the study was to characterize the existing farming system in a typical water stressed environment in the Ethiopian highlands in terms of crop and livestock production and to assess LWP at household level.To this end, the characteristic watershed of Lenche Dima watershed was chosen. An exploratory assessment of LWP variables and potential differences between farmers’ wealth classes was conducted based on a survey of 54 sample households and focus group discussions. LWP was determined as the ratio of beneficial outputs over used water. We used market values of livestock products and services to unify the livestock outputs. Water used to produce the livestock outputs was determined based on water consumption to produce the feed. The overall water used per household for livestock production ranged from 3079 ± 2335 (s.d.) m3 per year to 11 975 ± 4080 (s.d.) m3 per year for poor and better-off households, respectively. If fully valued as fuel and fertilizer, manure contributed an overall 34% of the total financial livestock output, followed by draught power (22%), transport (17%) and milk production (16%). LWP ranged from 0.07 to 0.09 US$ m−3 and was not significantly different between farmers’ wealth classes. The small differences were an indication that all farmer types had very limited access to potential LWP improvements through increased feed quality and quantity, improved animal husbandry and better veterinary care.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace3054
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2011
publishDateRange 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace30542024-11-15T08:53:11Z Livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern Ethiopia Mekonnen, S. Descheemaeker, Katrien K. Tolera, Adugna Amede, Tilahun livestock water Agricultural systems of Northern Ethiopia are under pressure from demographic expansion leading to land degradation and increasing water scarcity. Livestock water productivity (LWP) is an important component in improving overall productivity in mixed crop-livestock systems. The objective of the study was to characterize the existing farming system in a typical water stressed environment in the Ethiopian highlands in terms of crop and livestock production and to assess LWP at household level.To this end, the characteristic watershed of Lenche Dima watershed was chosen. An exploratory assessment of LWP variables and potential differences between farmers’ wealth classes was conducted based on a survey of 54 sample households and focus group discussions. LWP was determined as the ratio of beneficial outputs over used water. We used market values of livestock products and services to unify the livestock outputs. Water used to produce the livestock outputs was determined based on water consumption to produce the feed. The overall water used per household for livestock production ranged from 3079 ± 2335 (s.d.) m3 per year to 11 975 ± 4080 (s.d.) m3 per year for poor and better-off households, respectively. If fully valued as fuel and fertilizer, manure contributed an overall 34% of the total financial livestock output, followed by draught power (22%), transport (17%) and milk production (16%). LWP ranged from 0.07 to 0.09 US$ m−3 and was not significantly different between farmers’ wealth classes. The small differences were an indication that all farmer types had very limited access to potential LWP improvements through increased feed quality and quantity, improved animal husbandry and better veterinary care. 2011-01 2011-01-15T10:54:32Z 2011-01-15T10:54:32Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/3054 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Mekonnen, S., Descheemaeker, K., Tolera, A. and Amede, T. 2011. Livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern Ethiopia. Experimental Agriculture 47(S1):85-98.
spellingShingle livestock
water
Mekonnen, S.
Descheemaeker, Katrien K.
Tolera, Adugna
Amede, Tilahun
Livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern Ethiopia
title Livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern Ethiopia
title_full Livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern Ethiopia
title_fullStr Livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern Ethiopia
title_short Livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern Ethiopia
title_sort livestock water productivity in a water stressed environment in northern ethiopia
topic livestock
water
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/3054
work_keys_str_mv AT mekonnens livestockwaterproductivityinawaterstressedenvironmentinnorthernethiopia
AT descheemaekerkatrienk livestockwaterproductivityinawaterstressedenvironmentinnorthernethiopia
AT toleraadugna livestockwaterproductivityinawaterstressedenvironmentinnorthernethiopia
AT amedetilahun livestockwaterproductivityinawaterstressedenvironmentinnorthernethiopia