Definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems
The objective of this study was to define breeding objectives and consequently determine optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems. Profits and economic values (EVs) were estimated for four genotypes namely (a) original stock or local goat breeds with 0% German Alp...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2011
|
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/2982 |
| _version_ | 1855535813124685824 |
|---|---|
| author | Bett, R.C. Kosgey, I.S. Kahi, A.K. Peters, Kurt J. |
| author_browse | Bett, R.C. Kahi, A.K. Kosgey, I.S. Peters, Kurt J. |
| author_facet | Bett, R.C. Kosgey, I.S. Kahi, A.K. Peters, Kurt J. |
| author_sort | Bett, R.C. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The objective of this study was to define breeding objectives and consequently determine optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems. Profits and economic values (EVs) were estimated for four genotypes namely (a) original stock or local goat breeds with 0% German Alpine blood level (OS), (b) F1 with 50% German Alpine blood level (F1), (c) first backcross with 75% German Alpine blood level (B1) and (d) second backcross with 87.5% German Alpine blood level (B2). The EVs were estimated for average daily milk yield (DMY, kg), average post-weaning daily gain (ADG, kg), number of kids weaned (NKW), mature weight (MW, kg) and 12-month live weight (LW, kg). Profitability in Kenyan Shilling (KES) without risk was optimal (KES 6038.02) for the B1 genotype. Economic values without risk for most traits were highest for the F1 genotype, i.e., KES 64.85 (ADG), 24.02 (NKW), −27.55 (MW) and 84.51 (LW). There was, however, a 23% reduction in profits in the F1 genotype. It was evident that crossbreeding would improve the profitability of the smallholder farms, but not beyond the 75% grade level. A similar trend was observed when risk was incorporated. Differences in profitability with and without risk were less than 0.005% for all the genotypes. However, differences in EVs were large, ranging from −28% to +19%; DMY had the largest differences. Therefore, incorporation of risk in estimation of EVs for traits of importance is necessary. This study has also demonstrated that crossbreeding to a higher grade level is not necessarily compensated for by a high performance in most traits. Therefore, a crossbreeding program targeting B1 (75%) crossbreds would be desirable for implementation in the smallholder production systems. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace2982 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateRange | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| publisherStr | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace29822023-12-08T19:36:04Z Definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems Bett, R.C. Kosgey, I.S. Kahi, A.K. Peters, Kurt J. The objective of this study was to define breeding objectives and consequently determine optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems. Profits and economic values (EVs) were estimated for four genotypes namely (a) original stock or local goat breeds with 0% German Alpine blood level (OS), (b) F1 with 50% German Alpine blood level (F1), (c) first backcross with 75% German Alpine blood level (B1) and (d) second backcross with 87.5% German Alpine blood level (B2). The EVs were estimated for average daily milk yield (DMY, kg), average post-weaning daily gain (ADG, kg), number of kids weaned (NKW), mature weight (MW, kg) and 12-month live weight (LW, kg). Profitability in Kenyan Shilling (KES) without risk was optimal (KES 6038.02) for the B1 genotype. Economic values without risk for most traits were highest for the F1 genotype, i.e., KES 64.85 (ADG), 24.02 (NKW), −27.55 (MW) and 84.51 (LW). There was, however, a 23% reduction in profits in the F1 genotype. It was evident that crossbreeding would improve the profitability of the smallholder farms, but not beyond the 75% grade level. A similar trend was observed when risk was incorporated. Differences in profitability with and without risk were less than 0.005% for all the genotypes. However, differences in EVs were large, ranging from −28% to +19%; DMY had the largest differences. Therefore, incorporation of risk in estimation of EVs for traits of importance is necessary. This study has also demonstrated that crossbreeding to a higher grade level is not necessarily compensated for by a high performance in most traits. Therefore, a crossbreeding program targeting B1 (75%) crossbreds would be desirable for implementation in the smallholder production systems. 2011-03 2010-12-11 2010-12-11 Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/2982 en Limited Access Elsevier Bett, R.C., Kosgey, I.S., Kahi, A.K. and Peters, K.J. 2011. Definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems. Small Ruminant Research 96(1):16-24. |
| spellingShingle | Bett, R.C. Kosgey, I.S. Kahi, A.K. Peters, Kurt J. Definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems |
| title | Definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems |
| title_full | Definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems |
| title_fullStr | Definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems |
| title_full_unstemmed | Definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems |
| title_short | Definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems |
| title_sort | definition of breeding objectives and optimum crossbreeding levels for goats in the smallholder production systems |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/2982 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bettrc definitionofbreedingobjectivesandoptimumcrossbreedinglevelsforgoatsinthesmallholderproductionsystems AT kosgeyis definitionofbreedingobjectivesandoptimumcrossbreedinglevelsforgoatsinthesmallholderproductionsystems AT kahiak definitionofbreedingobjectivesandoptimumcrossbreedinglevelsforgoatsinthesmallholderproductionsystems AT peterskurtj definitionofbreedingobjectivesandoptimumcrossbreedinglevelsforgoatsinthesmallholderproductionsystems |