Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)

A rapid, visually read, dot-ELISA developed for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in tsetse flies (Glossina spp.), was field tested alongside the standard fly dissection method on a ranch in south eastern Kenya. Of 104 G. pallidipes dissected, 2 were found to be infected with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bosompem, K.M., Masake, R.A., Assoku, R.K.G., Opiyo, E.A., Nantulya, V.M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Cambridge University Press 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/29386
_version_ 1855515081750609920
author Bosompem, K.M.
Masake, R.A.
Assoku, R.K.G.
Opiyo, E.A.
Nantulya, V.M.
author_browse Assoku, R.K.G.
Bosompem, K.M.
Masake, R.A.
Nantulya, V.M.
Opiyo, E.A.
author_facet Bosompem, K.M.
Masake, R.A.
Assoku, R.K.G.
Opiyo, E.A.
Nantulya, V.M.
author_sort Bosompem, K.M.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description A rapid, visually read, dot-ELISA developed for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in tsetse flies (Glossina spp.), was field tested alongside the standard fly dissection method on a ranch in south eastern Kenya. Of 104 G. pallidipes dissected, 2 were found to be infected with trypanosomes in their midguts. By the dissection method the infecting trypanosome species could not be identified, as both flies had no salivary gland infections. However, using the dot-ELISA, the 2 flies were shown to be infected with Trypanosoma congolense in their midguts. The midguts of an additional 6 (5.8 percent) of the 104j G. pallidipes tested positive for T. congolense in the dot-ELISA, even though no trypanosomes were seen on dissection. The infection rate for this fly species as determined using the dot-ELISA, therefore was 7.7 percent for T. congolense in midgut infections compared to 1.9 percent identified by fly dissection. The salivary glands and mouthparts of the 6 additional tsetse flies identified by dot-ELISA were all negative as determined by the 2 techniques. None of 390 G. longipennis flies dissected and examined for trypanosomes in the midgut, salivary glands and mouthparts was shown by this method, to be infected. Using the dot-ELISA, however, 17 (4.4 percent) of the flies tested positive for T. congolense in the midgut, whilst the salivary glands and mouthparts of the same flies were negative. Thus, the dot-ELISA appears to be more sensitive than the fly dissection method under field conditions. Moreover, the dot-ELISA can be performed in the field without electricity. It is simple to perform, and was not affected by high ambient temperatures (22-32 degree centigrade) or by contamination of reactants with dust.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace29386
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 1996
publishDateRange 1996
publishDateSort 1996
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace293862024-11-15T08:52:05Z Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.) Bosompem, K.M. Masake, R.A. Assoku, R.K.G. Opiyo, E.A. Nantulya, V.M. trypanosomes (phytomonas) glossinidae evaluation infection monoclonal antibodies elisa infectious diseases parasitology A rapid, visually read, dot-ELISA developed for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in tsetse flies (Glossina spp.), was field tested alongside the standard fly dissection method on a ranch in south eastern Kenya. Of 104 G. pallidipes dissected, 2 were found to be infected with trypanosomes in their midguts. By the dissection method the infecting trypanosome species could not be identified, as both flies had no salivary gland infections. However, using the dot-ELISA, the 2 flies were shown to be infected with Trypanosoma congolense in their midguts. The midguts of an additional 6 (5.8 percent) of the 104j G. pallidipes tested positive for T. congolense in the dot-ELISA, even though no trypanosomes were seen on dissection. The infection rate for this fly species as determined using the dot-ELISA, therefore was 7.7 percent for T. congolense in midgut infections compared to 1.9 percent identified by fly dissection. The salivary glands and mouthparts of the 6 additional tsetse flies identified by dot-ELISA were all negative as determined by the 2 techniques. None of 390 G. longipennis flies dissected and examined for trypanosomes in the midgut, salivary glands and mouthparts was shown by this method, to be infected. Using the dot-ELISA, however, 17 (4.4 percent) of the flies tested positive for T. congolense in the midgut, whilst the salivary glands and mouthparts of the same flies were negative. Thus, the dot-ELISA appears to be more sensitive than the fly dissection method under field conditions. Moreover, the dot-ELISA can be performed in the field without electricity. It is simple to perform, and was not affected by high ambient temperatures (22-32 degree centigrade) or by contamination of reactants with dust. 1996-02 2013-06-11T09:23:23Z 2013-06-11T09:23:23Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/29386 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Parasitology;112: 205-211
spellingShingle trypanosomes (phytomonas)
glossinidae
evaluation
infection
monoclonal antibodies
elisa
infectious diseases
parasitology
Bosompem, K.M.
Masake, R.A.
Assoku, R.K.G.
Opiyo, E.A.
Nantulya, V.M.
Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_full Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_fullStr Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_full_unstemmed Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_short Field evaluation of a dot-ELISA for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.)
title_sort field evaluation of a dot elisa for the detection and differentiation of trypanosome species in infected tsetse flies glossina spp
topic trypanosomes (phytomonas)
glossinidae
evaluation
infection
monoclonal antibodies
elisa
infectious diseases
parasitology
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/29386
work_keys_str_mv AT bosompemkm fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp
AT masakera fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp
AT assokurkg fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp
AT opiyoea fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp
AT nantulyavm fieldevaluationofadotelisaforthedetectionanddifferentiationoftrypanosomespeciesininfectedtsetsefliesglossinaspp