Institutions, governance and incentives in common property regimes for African rangelands
The general distinctions between open access, state property, common proerty and private property are now well established in the academic literature. When applied to African rangelands, however, common property admits a wide variety of resource management regimes. To formulate effective policies it...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Springer
1995
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/28494 |
Similar Items: Institutions, governance and incentives in common property regimes for African rangelands
- LPA Brief No. 1. Institutions, governance and incentives in common property regimes for African rangelands
- Marketing, livestock Development, and rangeland utilization
- Co-management or no management: The prospects for internal governance of common property regimes through dynamic contracts
- What are the environmental impacts of property rights regimes in forests, fisheries and rangelands?: a systematic review protocol
- Hybrid institutions: applications of common property theory beyond discrete property regimes
- Environmental impacts of different property regimes in forests, fisheries and rangelands: preliminary findings from a systematic review