Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia

This paper examines the nature of community management of woodlots and investigates the determinants of collective action and its effectiveness in managing woodlots, based on a survey of 100 villages in Tigray, northern Ethiopia. We find that collective management of woodlots generally functions wel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gebremedhin, Berhanu, Pender, J.L., Tesfay, G.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Cambridge University Press 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/28492
_version_ 1855516304505569280
author Gebremedhin, Berhanu
Pender, J.L.
Tesfay, G.
author_browse Gebremedhin, Berhanu
Pender, J.L.
Tesfay, G.
author_facet Gebremedhin, Berhanu
Pender, J.L.
Tesfay, G.
author_sort Gebremedhin, Berhanu
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This paper examines the nature of community management of woodlots and investigates the determinants of collective action and its effectiveness in managing woodlots, based on a survey of 100 villages in Tigray, northern Ethiopia. We find that collective management of woodlots generally functions well in Tigray. Despite limited current benefits received by community members, the woodlots contribute substantially to community wealth, increasing members’ willingness to provide collective effort to manage the woodlots. We find that benefits are greater and problems less on woodlots managed at the village level than those managed at a higher municipality level, and that the average intensity of management is greater on village-managed woodlots. Nevertheless, we find little evidence of differences in collective management of woodlots or its effectiveness on village vs. municipality-managed woodlots, after controlling for other factors. The factors that do significantly affect collective action include population density (higher collective labor input and lower planting density at intermediate than at low or high density), market access (less labor input, planting density and tree survival where market access is better), and presence of external organizations promoting the woodlot (reduces local effort to protect the woodlot and tree survival). The finding of an inverse U-shaped relationship between population density and collective labor input is consistent with induced innovation theory, with the increased labor/land ratio promoting collective effort to invest in resources as population density grows to a moderate level, while incentive problems may undermine collective action at high levels of population density. The negative effect of market access suggests that higher opportunity costs of labor and/or increased “exit options” undermine collective resource management. The negative effect of external organizational presence suggests that external organizations are displacing local efforts to protect woodlots. These findings suggest collective action may be more beneficial and more effective when managed at a more local level, when the role of external organizations is more demand-driven, and when promoted in intermediate population density communities more remote from markets. In higher population density settings and areas closer to markets, private-oriented approaches are likely to be more effective.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace28492
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2003
publishDateRange 2003
publishDateSort 2003
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace284922025-10-08T18:40:36Z Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia Gebremedhin, Berhanu Pender, J.L. Tesfay, G. woodlands resource management natural resources collectivization economic analysis community development development forest management population density collective behavior ethiopia land management This paper examines the nature of community management of woodlots and investigates the determinants of collective action and its effectiveness in managing woodlots, based on a survey of 100 villages in Tigray, northern Ethiopia. We find that collective management of woodlots generally functions well in Tigray. Despite limited current benefits received by community members, the woodlots contribute substantially to community wealth, increasing members’ willingness to provide collective effort to manage the woodlots. We find that benefits are greater and problems less on woodlots managed at the village level than those managed at a higher municipality level, and that the average intensity of management is greater on village-managed woodlots. Nevertheless, we find little evidence of differences in collective management of woodlots or its effectiveness on village vs. municipality-managed woodlots, after controlling for other factors. The factors that do significantly affect collective action include population density (higher collective labor input and lower planting density at intermediate than at low or high density), market access (less labor input, planting density and tree survival where market access is better), and presence of external organizations promoting the woodlot (reduces local effort to protect the woodlot and tree survival). The finding of an inverse U-shaped relationship between population density and collective labor input is consistent with induced innovation theory, with the increased labor/land ratio promoting collective effort to invest in resources as population density grows to a moderate level, while incentive problems may undermine collective action at high levels of population density. The negative effect of market access suggests that higher opportunity costs of labor and/or increased “exit options” undermine collective resource management. The negative effect of external organizational presence suggests that external organizations are displacing local efforts to protect woodlots. These findings suggest collective action may be more beneficial and more effective when managed at a more local level, when the role of external organizations is more demand-driven, and when promoted in intermediate population density communities more remote from markets. In higher population density settings and areas closer to markets, private-oriented approaches are likely to be more effective. 2003-02 2013-05-06T07:00:43Z 2013-05-06T07:00:43Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/28492 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Gebremedhin, Berhanu; Pender, J.L.; Tesfay, G. 2003. Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia. Environment and Development Economics 8(1): 129-148
spellingShingle woodlands
resource management
natural resources
collectivization
economic analysis
community development
development
forest management
population density
collective behavior
ethiopia
land management
Gebremedhin, Berhanu
Pender, J.L.
Tesfay, G.
Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia
title Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia
title_full Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia
title_fullStr Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia
title_short Community natural resource management: The case of woodlots in northern Ethiopia
title_sort community natural resource management the case of woodlots in northern ethiopia
topic woodlands
resource management
natural resources
collectivization
economic analysis
community development
development
forest management
population density
collective behavior
ethiopia
land management
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/28492
work_keys_str_mv AT gebremedhinberhanu communitynaturalresourcemanagementthecaseofwoodlotsinnorthernethiopia
AT penderjl communitynaturalresourcemanagementthecaseofwoodlotsinnorthernethiopia
AT tesfayg communitynaturalresourcemanagementthecaseofwoodlotsinnorthernethiopia