Disseminating improved practices: Are volunteer farmer trainers effective?
Purpose: This paper assesses the effectiveness of volunteer farmer trainers in promoting adoption of agricultural technologies in western Kenya. Specifically, the purpose was to assess the type of information they disseminated, farmer trainers' characteristics desirable to farmer trainees, and how t...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Informa UK Limited
2012
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/21799 |
| _version_ | 1855541666292695040 |
|---|---|
| author | Lukuyu, Ben A. Place, Frank Franzel, Steven Kiptot, E. |
| author_browse | Franzel, Steven Kiptot, E. Lukuyu, Ben A. Place, Frank |
| author_facet | Lukuyu, Ben A. Place, Frank Franzel, Steven Kiptot, E. |
| author_sort | Lukuyu, Ben A. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Purpose: This paper assesses the effectiveness of volunteer farmer trainers in promoting adoption of agricultural technologies in western Kenya. Specifically, the purpose was to assess the type of information they disseminated, farmer trainers' characteristics desirable to farmer trainees, and how trainees evaluate farmer trainers. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected through focused group and open discussions, and interviews with 44 farmer trainers (32% women) and 91 trainees (63% women). Effectiveness of training was assessed based on level of learner satisfaction and attributes pertaining to knowledge, skill, attitude and application of the learning on farms. Other topics examined included selection of farmer trainers, organization of training, type, how and to whom information is disseminated, and farmer trainers' constraints and opportunities. Findings: Farmer trainers played important roles such as mobilizing and training fellow farmers, hosting demonstration plots, bulking and distributing planting materials. They were, however, rated slightly lower in follow-ups and seed bulking. Farmer trainers disseminate on average two to four different types of technology. Crop-based technologies were disseminated more than livestock-based ones because of their simplicity. Technical backstopping from extension workers remains a challenge, which may compromise quality of information disseminated. The survey showed that the approach is sustainable, with farmer trainers continuing their work several years after project support had ended. Practical implications: The results from this study are of use to development programmes keen on using low-cost, community-based dissemination approaches. Recommendations are also given on selecting farmer trainers, organizing training, types of technologies to disseminate incentives, and sustainability. Originality/value: The added value lies in filling information gaps in the use and effectiveness of the farmer trainer approach in promoting technology dissemination. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace21799 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateRange | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Informa UK Limited |
| publisherStr | Informa UK Limited |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace217992024-04-25T06:01:55Z Disseminating improved practices: Are volunteer farmer trainers effective? Lukuyu, Ben A. Place, Frank Franzel, Steven Kiptot, E. Purpose: This paper assesses the effectiveness of volunteer farmer trainers in promoting adoption of agricultural technologies in western Kenya. Specifically, the purpose was to assess the type of information they disseminated, farmer trainers' characteristics desirable to farmer trainees, and how trainees evaluate farmer trainers. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected through focused group and open discussions, and interviews with 44 farmer trainers (32% women) and 91 trainees (63% women). Effectiveness of training was assessed based on level of learner satisfaction and attributes pertaining to knowledge, skill, attitude and application of the learning on farms. Other topics examined included selection of farmer trainers, organization of training, type, how and to whom information is disseminated, and farmer trainers' constraints and opportunities. Findings: Farmer trainers played important roles such as mobilizing and training fellow farmers, hosting demonstration plots, bulking and distributing planting materials. They were, however, rated slightly lower in follow-ups and seed bulking. Farmer trainers disseminate on average two to four different types of technology. Crop-based technologies were disseminated more than livestock-based ones because of their simplicity. Technical backstopping from extension workers remains a challenge, which may compromise quality of information disseminated. The survey showed that the approach is sustainable, with farmer trainers continuing their work several years after project support had ended. Practical implications: The results from this study are of use to development programmes keen on using low-cost, community-based dissemination approaches. Recommendations are also given on selecting farmer trainers, organizing training, types of technologies to disseminate incentives, and sustainability. Originality/value: The added value lies in filling information gaps in the use and effectiveness of the farmer trainer approach in promoting technology dissemination. 2012-10 2012-09-19T18:34:54Z 2012-09-19T18:34:54Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/21799 en Open Access Informa UK Limited Lukuyu B, Place F, Franzel S and Kiptot E. 2012. Disseminating improved practices: Are volunteer farmer trainers effective? Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 18(5): 525-540. |
| spellingShingle | Lukuyu, Ben A. Place, Frank Franzel, Steven Kiptot, E. Disseminating improved practices: Are volunteer farmer trainers effective? |
| title | Disseminating improved practices: Are volunteer farmer trainers effective? |
| title_full | Disseminating improved practices: Are volunteer farmer trainers effective? |
| title_fullStr | Disseminating improved practices: Are volunteer farmer trainers effective? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Disseminating improved practices: Are volunteer farmer trainers effective? |
| title_short | Disseminating improved practices: Are volunteer farmer trainers effective? |
| title_sort | disseminating improved practices are volunteer farmer trainers effective |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/21799 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lukuyubena disseminatingimprovedpracticesarevolunteerfarmertrainerseffective AT placefrank disseminatingimprovedpracticesarevolunteerfarmertrainerseffective AT franzelsteven disseminatingimprovedpracticesarevolunteerfarmertrainerseffective AT kiptote disseminatingimprovedpracticesarevolunteerfarmertrainerseffective |