Evidence-based conservation: lessons from the Lower Mekong
There is a considerable gap between the science of conservation biology and the design and execution of biodiversity conservation projects in the field. Science is often failing to inform the practice of conservation, which remains largely experience-based. The main reason is the poor accessibility...
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Earthscan
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20979 |
Ejemplares similares: Evidence-based conservation: lessons from the Lower Mekong
- Introduction: evidence-based conservation from the Lower Mekong
- Lessons learned from conservation and development interventions in the Lower Mekong
- Getting REDD to work in the Lower Mekong: lessons learned from Integrated Conservation and Development Projects
- Losing less and winning more: project strategies to negotiate between conservation and development in the Lower Mekong
- Losing less and winning more: Building capacity to go beyond the trade-offs between conservation and development in the Lower Mekong
- Forest degradation in the Lower Mekong and an assessment of protected area effectiveness c1990-c2009: a satellite perspective