Zero, one, or in between: Evaluation of alternative national and entity-level accounting for bioenergy
Accounting for bioenergy's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, as done under the Kyoto Protocol (KP) and European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme, fails to capture the full extent of these emissions. As a consequence, other approaches have been suggested. Both the EU and United States already use va...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20925 |
Similar Items: Zero, one, or in between: Evaluation of alternative national and entity-level accounting for bioenergy
- Review of existing methods for carbon accounting
- Carbon outcomes of major land-cover transitions in SE Asia: great uncertainties and REDD+ policy implications
- Chinese Governance and Transformation Towards Carbon Neutrality
- Emission balances of first -and second- generation biofuels: Case studies from Africa, Mexico and Indonesia
- Forests and climate change: a toolbox
- Improved methods for carbon accounting for bioenergy: descriptions and evaluations