Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia

Two extremes of forest conflict exist: low- and high-intensity conflicts. Theoretical debate on how forest conflict escalates from one extreme to the other has begun to take place; however, empirical research is lacking. Our paper aims to explore the conflict escalation process using a case study ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yasmi, Yurdi, Schanz, H.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20632
_version_ 1855541878265479168
author Yasmi, Yurdi
Schanz, H.
author_browse Schanz, H.
Yasmi, Yurdi
author_facet Yasmi, Yurdi
Schanz, H.
author_sort Yasmi, Yurdi
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Two extremes of forest conflict exist: low- and high-intensity conflicts. Theoretical debate on how forest conflict escalates from one extreme to the other has begun to take place; however, empirical research is lacking. Our paper aims to explore the conflict escalation process using a case study approach. We explored whether two theoretical building blocks of conflict escalation (stages and patterns) can be evaluated at the field level.We conducted fieldwork in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, to investigate a conflict between a logging company and a local community.We performed interviews and focus group discussions with key stakeholders. The conflict revolved around an unclear boundary between a state forest, within which the logging company operated, and the communal forest, which led to local community opposition to logging activity. The conflict escalated over time as parties failed to find a solution.We describe escalation stages associated with the conflict and also the pattern of conflict escalation. The findings suggest that theoretical frameworks of conflict escalation are applicable at field level. A number of practical options for managing the conflict and the implications for wider forest management are discussed. While understanding the conflict escalation process does not necessarily guarantee effective settlement of a conflict, it nonetheless helps to strategically devise conflict management efforts.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace20632
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2010
publishDateRange 2010
publishDateSort 2010
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace206322025-01-24T14:20:57Z Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia Yasmi, Yurdi Schanz, H. natural resources management non-timber forest products conflicts decentralization Two extremes of forest conflict exist: low- and high-intensity conflicts. Theoretical debate on how forest conflict escalates from one extreme to the other has begun to take place; however, empirical research is lacking. Our paper aims to explore the conflict escalation process using a case study approach. We explored whether two theoretical building blocks of conflict escalation (stages and patterns) can be evaluated at the field level.We conducted fieldwork in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, to investigate a conflict between a logging company and a local community.We performed interviews and focus group discussions with key stakeholders. The conflict revolved around an unclear boundary between a state forest, within which the logging company operated, and the communal forest, which led to local community opposition to logging activity. The conflict escalated over time as parties failed to find a solution.We describe escalation stages associated with the conflict and also the pattern of conflict escalation. The findings suggest that theoretical frameworks of conflict escalation are applicable at field level. A number of practical options for managing the conflict and the implications for wider forest management are discussed. While understanding the conflict escalation process does not necessarily guarantee effective settlement of a conflict, it nonetheless helps to strategically devise conflict management efforts. 2010 2012-06-04T09:15:02Z 2012-06-04T09:15:02Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20632 en Yasmi, Y., Schanz, H. 2010. Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia . International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 6 (1) :43–51. ISSN: 2151-3740.
spellingShingle natural resources management
non-timber forest products
conflicts
decentralization
Yasmi, Yurdi
Schanz, H.
Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia
title Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia
title_full Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia
title_fullStr Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia
title_short Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia
title_sort managing conflict escalation in forestry logging versus local community interests in baru pelepat village sumatra indonesia
topic natural resources management
non-timber forest products
conflicts
decentralization
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20632
work_keys_str_mv AT yasmiyurdi managingconflictescalationinforestryloggingversuslocalcommunityinterestsinbarupelepatvillagesumatraindonesia
AT schanzh managingconflictescalationinforestryloggingversuslocalcommunityinterestsinbarupelepatvillagesumatraindonesia