Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions

In many developing countries, tenure in forests is not clear and subject to dispute. This will place limits on the effectiveness, efficiency and equity (3Es) of REDD+. In spite of the attention paid to the problem of insecure tenure to date, there has been little progress toward clarifying tenure ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sunderlin, William D., Larson, A.M., Cronkleton, P.
Formato: Capítulo de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Center for International Forestry Research 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20287
_version_ 1855514446959476736
author Sunderlin, William D.
Larson, A.M.
Cronkleton, P.
author_browse Cronkleton, P.
Larson, A.M.
Sunderlin, William D.
author_facet Sunderlin, William D.
Larson, A.M.
Cronkleton, P.
author_sort Sunderlin, William D.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description In many developing countries, tenure in forests is not clear and subject to dispute. This will place limits on the effectiveness, efficiency and equity (3Es) of REDD+. In spite of the attention paid to the problem of insecure tenure to date, there has been little progress toward clarifying tenure arrangements. National governments need to take proactive steps to clarify tenure.
format Book Chapter
id CGSpace20287
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2009
publishDateRange 2009
publishDateSort 2009
publisher Center for International Forestry Research
publisherStr Center for International Forestry Research
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace202872025-01-24T14:11:54Z Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions Sunderlin, William D. Larson, A.M. Cronkleton, P. climate change mitigation tenure systems governance In many developing countries, tenure in forests is not clear and subject to dispute. This will place limits on the effectiveness, efficiency and equity (3Es) of REDD+. In spite of the attention paid to the problem of insecure tenure to date, there has been little progress toward clarifying tenure arrangements. National governments need to take proactive steps to clarify tenure. 2009 2012-06-04T09:13:14Z 2012-06-04T09:13:14Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20287 en Open Access Center for International Forestry Research Sunderlin, W.D., Larson, A.M., Cronkleton, P. 2009. Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions . In: Angelsen, A. with Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds).. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. :139-124. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ISBN: 978-6-02-869303-5..
spellingShingle climate change
mitigation
tenure systems
governance
Sunderlin, William D.
Larson, A.M.
Cronkleton, P.
Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions
title Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions
title_full Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions
title_fullStr Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions
title_full_unstemmed Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions
title_short Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions
title_sort forest tenure rights and redd from inertia to policy solutions
topic climate change
mitigation
tenure systems
governance
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20287
work_keys_str_mv AT sunderlinwilliamd foresttenurerightsandreddfrominertiatopolicysolutions
AT larsonam foresttenurerightsandreddfrominertiatopolicysolutions
AT cronkletonp foresttenurerightsandreddfrominertiatopolicysolutions