Policy options to reduce deforestation
Four types of policies could reduce deforestation: policies to depress agricultural rent, policies to increase and capture forest rent, policies that directly regulate land use, and cross-sector policies that underpin the first three. While payments for environmental services (PES) have clear advant...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20286 |
| _version_ | 1855520653089701888 |
|---|---|
| author | Angelsen, A. |
| author_browse | Angelsen, A. |
| author_facet | Angelsen, A. |
| author_sort | Angelsen, A. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Four types of policies could reduce deforestation: policies to depress agricultural rent, policies to increase and capture forest rent, policies that directly regulate land use, and cross-sector policies that underpin the first three. While payments for environmental services (PES) have clear advantages, in the early stages of REDD+ implementation, broader policies which address underlying causes are more feasible and likely to be more successful. REDD+ is a new direction in forest conservation. This means that countries need to take into account research on deforestation, and lessons learned from previous forest conservation policies, when developing national REDD+ strategies. |
| format | Book Chapter |
| id | CGSpace20286 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateRange | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Center for International Forestry Research |
| publisherStr | Center for International Forestry Research |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace202862025-01-24T14:12:30Z Policy options to reduce deforestation Angelsen, A. climate change governance mitigation deforestation Four types of policies could reduce deforestation: policies to depress agricultural rent, policies to increase and capture forest rent, policies that directly regulate land use, and cross-sector policies that underpin the first three. While payments for environmental services (PES) have clear advantages, in the early stages of REDD+ implementation, broader policies which address underlying causes are more feasible and likely to be more successful. REDD+ is a new direction in forest conservation. This means that countries need to take into account research on deforestation, and lessons learned from previous forest conservation policies, when developing national REDD+ strategies. 2009 2012-06-04T09:13:13Z 2012-06-04T09:13:13Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20286 en Open Access Center for International Forestry Research Angelsen, A. 2009. Policy options to reduce deforestation . In: Angelsen, A. with Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds). Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. :125-138. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ISBN: 978-6-02-869303-5.. |
| spellingShingle | climate change governance mitigation deforestation Angelsen, A. Policy options to reduce deforestation |
| title | Policy options to reduce deforestation |
| title_full | Policy options to reduce deforestation |
| title_fullStr | Policy options to reduce deforestation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Policy options to reduce deforestation |
| title_short | Policy options to reduce deforestation |
| title_sort | policy options to reduce deforestation |
| topic | climate change governance mitigation deforestation |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20286 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT angelsena policyoptionstoreducedeforestation |