Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector

Investment in policy oriented research is rising despite uncertainties about the degree to which it has actually contributed to benefits for the poor and the environment thus far. To address these uncertainties, this Impact Assessment Paper explores a case example of the contribution of policy orien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Raitzer, David A.
Formato: Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Center for International Forestry Research 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20016
_version_ 1855529963338334208
author Raitzer, David A.
author_browse Raitzer, David A.
author_facet Raitzer, David A.
author_sort Raitzer, David A.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Investment in policy oriented research is rising despite uncertainties about the degree to which it has actually contributed to benefits for the poor and the environment thus far. To address these uncertainties, this Impact Assessment Paper explores a case example of the contribution of policy oriented research to improved environmental benefits. The subject of the assessment is political economy research that revealed how perverse incentives led to the clearance of large areas of natural forests for feeding massive Indonesian pulp mills. A semistructured interview approach is used to trace connections between the research, immediate users and actors ‘on the ground’, which enables the establishment of causality. Triangulation through document review helps validate these causal theories, and trend series statistical tests further reinforce the concurrence of identified changes with the availability of CIFOR’s findings. Counterfactual scenarios are established to draw these findings together into explicit postulates about what would have occurred without the research, upon which empirical quantitative analysis of resultant changes is performed. An economic surplus framework is developed to value the nonmarket benefits of averted natural forest clearance attributable to CIFOR’s research. These benefits, which principally result from reduced carbon emissions, are determined to range from $19 million to $583 million, depending on assumptions used, with a main estimate of $133 million (discounted US dollars). In the context of less than half a million dollars of direct research costs, this represents an exceptional return on investment.
format Libro
id CGSpace20016
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2008
publishDateRange 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publisher Center for International Forestry Research
publisherStr Center for International Forestry Research
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace200162025-01-24T14:19:49Z Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector Raitzer, David A. pulp and paper industry policy research impact evaluation Investment in policy oriented research is rising despite uncertainties about the degree to which it has actually contributed to benefits for the poor and the environment thus far. To address these uncertainties, this Impact Assessment Paper explores a case example of the contribution of policy oriented research to improved environmental benefits. The subject of the assessment is political economy research that revealed how perverse incentives led to the clearance of large areas of natural forests for feeding massive Indonesian pulp mills. A semistructured interview approach is used to trace connections between the research, immediate users and actors ‘on the ground’, which enables the establishment of causality. Triangulation through document review helps validate these causal theories, and trend series statistical tests further reinforce the concurrence of identified changes with the availability of CIFOR’s findings. Counterfactual scenarios are established to draw these findings together into explicit postulates about what would have occurred without the research, upon which empirical quantitative analysis of resultant changes is performed. An economic surplus framework is developed to value the nonmarket benefits of averted natural forest clearance attributable to CIFOR’s research. These benefits, which principally result from reduced carbon emissions, are determined to range from $19 million to $583 million, depending on assumptions used, with a main estimate of $133 million (discounted US dollars). In the context of less than half a million dollars of direct research costs, this represents an exceptional return on investment. 2008 2012-06-04T09:12:57Z 2012-06-04T09:12:57Z Book https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20016 en Open Access Center for International Forestry Research Raitzer, D.A. 2008. Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector . Impact Assessment Paper Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). 85p ISBN: 978-979-1412-72-8..
spellingShingle pulp and paper industry
policy research
impact
evaluation
Raitzer, David A.
Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector
title Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector
title_full Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector
title_fullStr Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector
title_short Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector
title_sort assessing the impact of cifor s influence on policy and practice in the indonesian pulp and paper sector
topic pulp and paper industry
policy research
impact
evaluation
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20016
work_keys_str_mv AT raitzerdavida assessingtheimpactofciforsinfluenceonpolicyandpracticeintheindonesianpulpandpapersector