Improving forest benefits for the poor: learning from community-based forest enterprises in Nepal

The study documents practices of 28 community-based forest enterprises (CBFEs) in Nepal, representing different enterprise models - FUGs (CFUGs or LFUGs), networks, cooperatives, and companies. FUGs are primarily constrained by their limited scale in terms of membership and land area. The formation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandit, B.H., Albano, A., Kumar, C.
Formato: Libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Center for International Forestry Research 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19823
_version_ 1855513924114317312
author Pandit, B.H.
Albano, A.
Kumar, C.
author_browse Albano, A.
Kumar, C.
Pandit, B.H.
author_facet Pandit, B.H.
Albano, A.
Kumar, C.
author_sort Pandit, B.H.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The study documents practices of 28 community-based forest enterprises (CBFEs) in Nepal, representing different enterprise models - FUGs (CFUGs or LFUGs), networks, cooperatives, and companies. FUGs are primarily constrained by their limited scale in terms of membership and land area. The formation of intergroups and networks minimizes this limitation. Networks are often constrained from doing group enterprises since they do not have legal identity to transact as a group and this constraint can be overcome by registering as a formal business entity - either as a cooperative or a company. Specific constraints to cooperatives and companies were also identified and the effective practices presented. The study highlighted many constraints to enterprise development targeting to include and benefit the poorest of the poor. One good practice is the provision of a revolving fund by donors that will enable the poor to buy shares in the cooperative or company. Other practices include offering labour opportunities to the poorest (e.g. NTFP collection and factory labour), and representation of the poorest and marginalized in FUG executive committees. Recommendations include replicating the good practices of the CBFEs while improving on their weaknesses such as federating and formalizing FUGs into networks, cooperatives, or private companies; adding value to variation forest products; increasing equity in distribution of benefits; promoting resource sustainability; and the capacity building of the various stakeholders.
format Libro
id CGSpace19823
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2008
publishDateRange 2008
publishDateSort 2008
publisher Center for International Forestry Research
publisherStr Center for International Forestry Research
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace198232025-01-24T14:11:50Z Improving forest benefits for the poor: learning from community-based forest enterprises in Nepal Pandit, B.H. Albano, A. Kumar, C. community forestry enterprises cooperatives income livelihoods constraints institutions capacity building guidelines The study documents practices of 28 community-based forest enterprises (CBFEs) in Nepal, representing different enterprise models - FUGs (CFUGs or LFUGs), networks, cooperatives, and companies. FUGs are primarily constrained by their limited scale in terms of membership and land area. The formation of intergroups and networks minimizes this limitation. Networks are often constrained from doing group enterprises since they do not have legal identity to transact as a group and this constraint can be overcome by registering as a formal business entity - either as a cooperative or a company. Specific constraints to cooperatives and companies were also identified and the effective practices presented. The study highlighted many constraints to enterprise development targeting to include and benefit the poorest of the poor. One good practice is the provision of a revolving fund by donors that will enable the poor to buy shares in the cooperative or company. Other practices include offering labour opportunities to the poorest (e.g. NTFP collection and factory labour), and representation of the poorest and marginalized in FUG executive committees. Recommendations include replicating the good practices of the CBFEs while improving on their weaknesses such as federating and formalizing FUGs into networks, cooperatives, or private companies; adding value to variation forest products; increasing equity in distribution of benefits; promoting resource sustainability; and the capacity building of the various stakeholders. 2008 2012-06-04T09:12:46Z 2012-06-04T09:12:46Z Book https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19823 en Open Access Center for International Forestry Research Pandit, B.H., Albano, A., Kumar, C. 2008. Improving forest benefits for the poor: learning from community-based forest enterprises in Nepal . Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). 47p. ISBN: 978-979-1412-37-7..
spellingShingle community forestry
enterprises
cooperatives
income
livelihoods
constraints
institutions
capacity building
guidelines
Pandit, B.H.
Albano, A.
Kumar, C.
Improving forest benefits for the poor: learning from community-based forest enterprises in Nepal
title Improving forest benefits for the poor: learning from community-based forest enterprises in Nepal
title_full Improving forest benefits for the poor: learning from community-based forest enterprises in Nepal
title_fullStr Improving forest benefits for the poor: learning from community-based forest enterprises in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Improving forest benefits for the poor: learning from community-based forest enterprises in Nepal
title_short Improving forest benefits for the poor: learning from community-based forest enterprises in Nepal
title_sort improving forest benefits for the poor learning from community based forest enterprises in nepal
topic community forestry
enterprises
cooperatives
income
livelihoods
constraints
institutions
capacity building
guidelines
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19823
work_keys_str_mv AT panditbh improvingforestbenefitsforthepoorlearningfromcommunitybasedforestenterprisesinnepal
AT albanoa improvingforestbenefitsforthepoorlearningfromcommunitybasedforestenterprisesinnepal
AT kumarc improvingforestbenefitsforthepoorlearningfromcommunitybasedforestenterprisesinnepal