Poverty and forests: multi-country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions

This paper examines poverty and deforestation in developing countries as linked problems and focuses on policies that can favour poverty alleviation in forested regions. The paper encompasses two elements: analysis of the spatial coincidence between poverty and forests, and proposed policy options f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Brief
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Center for International Forestry Research 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19703
_version_ 1855535466243162112
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This paper examines poverty and deforestation in developing countries as linked problems and focuses on policies that can favour poverty alleviation in forested regions. The paper encompasses two elements: analysis of the spatial coincidence between poverty and forests, and proposed policy options for reducing poverty in forested areas. It is assumed that three key frames of reference must be borne in mind in order to produce the best possible policies: (1) the location of the rural poor and types and levels of poverty in relation to forest resources; (2) variations in the density of forest cover in relation to distance from urban areas (the von Thünen scale); and (3) variations in forest cover over time (high, low, then partial restoration) in relation to a country’s forest transition experience. There are three main conclusions linked to these frames of reference. (1) Although relatively few people live in areas of high forest cover, they tend to be characterised by high rates of poverty and they are among the ‘poorest of the poor’. (2) Four policy approaches are recommended for lifting people out of poverty: transfer of ownership of forest lands from governments to forest dwellers; facilitation of access to forest product markets; promotion of commercial-scale community forestry and company–community partnerships; and establishment of payments for forest environmental services that are pro-poor. Implementation of these four strategies must take into account the implications of the four von Thünen zones (periurban, agricultural mosaic, forest frontier, and relatively undisturbed forests). (3) One cannot place blind faith in economic growth and laissez-faire for reducing poverty in forested areas. Strategic policy interventions are necessary to assist the process of livelihood improvement.
format Brief
id CGSpace19703
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2007
publishDateRange 2007
publishDateSort 2007
publisher Center for International Forestry Research
publisherStr Center for International Forestry Research
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace197032025-01-24T14:20:20Z Poverty and forests: multi-country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions poverty forest resources spatial distribution spatial variation land ownership forest products markets community forestry companies partnerships This paper examines poverty and deforestation in developing countries as linked problems and focuses on policies that can favour poverty alleviation in forested regions. The paper encompasses two elements: analysis of the spatial coincidence between poverty and forests, and proposed policy options for reducing poverty in forested areas. It is assumed that three key frames of reference must be borne in mind in order to produce the best possible policies: (1) the location of the rural poor and types and levels of poverty in relation to forest resources; (2) variations in the density of forest cover in relation to distance from urban areas (the von Thünen scale); and (3) variations in forest cover over time (high, low, then partial restoration) in relation to a country’s forest transition experience. There are three main conclusions linked to these frames of reference. (1) Although relatively few people live in areas of high forest cover, they tend to be characterised by high rates of poverty and they are among the ‘poorest of the poor’. (2) Four policy approaches are recommended for lifting people out of poverty: transfer of ownership of forest lands from governments to forest dwellers; facilitation of access to forest product markets; promotion of commercial-scale community forestry and company–community partnerships; and establishment of payments for forest environmental services that are pro-poor. Implementation of these four strategies must take into account the implications of the four von Thünen zones (periurban, agricultural mosaic, forest frontier, and relatively undisturbed forests). (3) One cannot place blind faith in economic growth and laissez-faire for reducing poverty in forested areas. Strategic policy interventions are necessary to assist the process of livelihood improvement. 2007 2012-06-04T09:12:39Z 2012-06-04T09:12:39Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19703 en Open Access Center for International Forestry Research Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). 2007. Poverty and forests: multi-country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions . CIFOR Infobrief No.12. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). 4p.
spellingShingle poverty
forest resources
spatial distribution
spatial variation
land ownership
forest products
markets
community forestry
companies
partnerships
Poverty and forests: multi-country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions
title Poverty and forests: multi-country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions
title_full Poverty and forests: multi-country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions
title_fullStr Poverty and forests: multi-country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions
title_full_unstemmed Poverty and forests: multi-country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions
title_short Poverty and forests: multi-country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions
title_sort poverty and forests multi country analysis of spatial association and proposed policy solutions
topic poverty
forest resources
spatial distribution
spatial variation
land ownership
forest products
markets
community forestry
companies
partnerships
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19703