Central Africa’s protected areas and the purported displacement of people: a first critical review of existing data
This paper examines the validity of data from the 12 case studies in six Central African parks cited by Cernea and Schmidt-Soltau (2003, 2006) and Schmidt-Soltau (2003). The same data are used for multiple papers to support the authors’ arguments relating to the human welfare costs of protected area...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wildlife Conservation Society Institute
2007
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19643 |
Ejemplares similares: Central Africa’s protected areas and the purported displacement of people: a first critical review of existing data
- Response to ‘is the displacement of people from parks only ‘purported’ or is it real?’ (Schmidt-Soltau 2009)
- Are Central Africa's protected areas displacing hundreds of thousands of rural poor?
- Forced displacement and resettlement
- Power, progress and impoverishment: plantations, hydropower, ecological change and community transformation in Hinboun District, Lao PDR: a field report
- Assessing long-term management options for the villages in the Korup National Park: an evaluation of all options
- Cross-border displacement