On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods

The current theory and narrative states that democratic decentralization of forest management leads to sustainable forest management and improved livelihoods. Three assumptions underlie this theory and narrative: i) democratic decentralization is a means of institutionalizing and scaling up communit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tacconi, L., Siagian, Y., Syam, R.
Format: Libro
Language:Inglés
Published: Australian National University 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19424
_version_ 1855518165495185408
author Tacconi, L.
Siagian, Y.
Syam, R.
author_browse Siagian, Y.
Syam, R.
Tacconi, L.
author_facet Tacconi, L.
Siagian, Y.
Syam, R.
author_sort Tacconi, L.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The current theory and narrative states that democratic decentralization of forest management leads to sustainable forest management and improved livelihoods. Three assumptions underlie this theory and narrative: i) democratic decentralization is a means of institutionalizing and scaling up community-based natural resource management; ii) rural people benefit from the forest and will conserve it; iii) the success of decentralization can be measured by lack (or lower rates) of deforestation. The paper argues that the first two assumptions do not hold when tested with primary and secondary data and that the third assumption is incorrect and should be discarded. A revised theory of decentralized forest management needs to be developed and an initial sketch is discussed.
format Libro
id CGSpace19424
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2006
publishDateRange 2006
publishDateSort 2006
publisher Australian National University
publisherStr Australian National University
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace194242025-01-24T14:12:17Z On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods Tacconi, L. Siagian, Y. Syam, R. decentralization forests poverty livelihoods rural communities deforestation The current theory and narrative states that democratic decentralization of forest management leads to sustainable forest management and improved livelihoods. Three assumptions underlie this theory and narrative: i) democratic decentralization is a means of institutionalizing and scaling up community-based natural resource management; ii) rural people benefit from the forest and will conserve it; iii) the success of decentralization can be measured by lack (or lower rates) of deforestation. The paper argues that the first two assumptions do not hold when tested with primary and secondary data and that the third assumption is incorrect and should be discarded. A revised theory of decentralized forest management needs to be developed and an initial sketch is discussed. 2006 2012-06-04T09:09:26Z 2012-06-04T09:09:26Z Book https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19424 en Australian National University Tacconi, L., Siagian, Y., Syam, R. 2006. On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods . Environmental Management and Development Occasional Papers No.9. Canberra, Australia, Australian National University. Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government. 18p.
spellingShingle decentralization
forests
poverty
livelihoods
rural communities
deforestation
Tacconi, L.
Siagian, Y.
Syam, R.
On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods
title On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods
title_full On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods
title_fullStr On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods
title_full_unstemmed On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods
title_short On the theory of decentralization, forests and livelihoods
title_sort on the theory of decentralization forests and livelihoods
topic decentralization
forests
poverty
livelihoods
rural communities
deforestation
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19424
work_keys_str_mv AT tacconil onthetheoryofdecentralizationforestsandlivelihoods
AT siagiany onthetheoryofdecentralizationforestsandlivelihoods
AT syamr onthetheoryofdecentralizationforestsandlivelihoods